View Full Version : Monsters??
SiestaSkyy
02-13-2006, 1:56 PM
Look I know that while angels and discus are technicaly cichlids... well they are hardly monster fish are they? thier delicate and are a far cry from large sizes. i guess i just don't see the connection.
No, not really monsters except in comparison to themselves but members keep them and questions come up so why not?
rallysman
02-13-2006, 6:59 PM
Monster isnt size. Its attitude.
its not necesarily the monster in the fish, as it is the monster in the keeper:)
aquaholic
02-13-2006, 8:37 PM
when i think of monster i think of size
when i think of monster i think of size
i bet everyone knows at least one fiesty little girl, you know the type i'm talking about
fishnutham
02-13-2006, 8:45 PM
monster to me is something everbodys afraid of hard to keep ect imo angles can be bad ass some of the wild varients are down right mean
eh1421
02-13-2006, 8:53 PM
:iagree: monster to me is something everbodys afraid of hard to keep ect imo angles can be bad ass some of the wild varients are down right mean
When i began in aquariophily (1989) I worked in with a fish saler. I have just set a nice big tank with a pair of angels, a pleco, a lot of plants. One mounth a pack with 100 neons was may payment. In the end of the next mounth all of them was eaten!! Monsters or not, they ate my neons!!
This is a great forum about monster fish. I joined because I really enjoy my Largemouth Bass and this is the perfect forum to talk about this species. I also keep platys, swordtails, plecos, corys, loaches, bullhead, NEON TETRAS, and barbs. This is a great forum to discuss these species as well, and I don't think MFK would be as great if it weren't well-rounded. Having said that, watching a big fish devour a smaller one is AWESOME!