Monster tank
- Thread starter Ullopincrate
- Start date
gt1009;2831649; said:I believe everyone considers a 180 a monster tank, but I may be wrong (I only have a 55)
I think everyone would love a 180 but the smallest would have to be a 125.
imo, a 180 with neons and cories isn't a monster tank but a 30g with exodons is. Its not the tank size thats important, its the fish inside. But maybe I'm biased since i have to make do with a 40g long for now 
Hasn't there been a Thread like this before ?
^ I Agree ^
But anyways . . . I would say about 300Gal Min' been a Monster tank , if we are talking about just the size of the thank and not whats in it .
wolfsburgfanatic;2832260; said:imo, a 180 with neons and cories isn't a monster tank but a 30g with exodons is. Its not the tank size thats important, its the fish inside. But maybe I'm biased since i have to make do with a 40g long for now
^ I Agree ^
But anyways . . . I would say about 300Gal Min' been a Monster tank , if we are talking about just the size of the thank and not whats in it .
I agree with the post about it being about the fish, not the tank itself. A smaller tank, say 75 gal, with a flowerhorn or some other large/aggressive fish should still be considered a monster tank. although it means little, really
these threads have been done to death but I'll play anyway. IMO any tank that is so big that you have to either have it special ordered or built is monster.
Most stores only carry up to a 210 or 220. Some can get the larger 265 and new 300 wides. so 265 would be the min. IMO b/cunless you're in a big city your going to have to order anything over 265.
Most stores only carry up to a 210 or 220. Some can get the larger 265 and new 300 wides. so 265 would be the min. IMO b/cunless you're in a big city your going to have to order anything over 265.