I have some actual questions about all this that I hope will elevate the discussion.
1. I know all about "F0" being a wild caught fish. And F1 is not quite as "good", and F2 is less, and so on. But does F1 and F2 mean inbred fish--children of 2 parents interbreeding? If I have 2 F0 fish, breed them together at my house, those offspring are still F0 -- but nobody would say my 2 WC F0 parents' offspring bred in a tank in my house are F0, too. Everybody would call them "F1", or "Captive Bred"? Why? The offspring are every bit as "unrelated" as they would have been if they'd hatched in a river 3 months before they were caught.
2. If you go to Ecuador, get in a canoe with a cast net, and catch 20 Festae out of a river, you don't really know that you've caught 20 unrelated fish. You very possibly could have caught 20 siblings. But every one of you would call those fish F0, right?
3. And this is a BIG one. How much inbreeding can a fish REALLY take before having genetic problems in the offspring? And don't be too hasty with this everyone. Fish are not people, they're not mammals, they're not even birds. I'm not SURE about this, but I think fish are probably even genetically "simpler" than land reptiles like snakes. They have evolved over long periods in very small bodies of water, with very little genetic variance introduced, and I THINK they can do just fine with a lot more "inbreeding" than we would all think.
I'm not a geneticist, but I think we all have assumptions about fish breeding based on what we think is proper genetic diversity with dogs and people--and that is probably not at all appropriate for fish. And I think we all make way more out of the whole "F0, F1, F2" thing than we should.
As for the lineage of these fish, I have actually been considering some Festae. And I would consider some Imperial Line Festae if I had MUCH more detail about the breeding program.
It would have been nice to see more detailed information about the breeding program and the lineage of these fish somewhere in the 50 plus posts.