Afrikaans Albanian Arabic Belarusian Bulgarian Catalan Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Filipino Finnish French Galician German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Irish Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Malay Maltese Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swahili Swedish Taiwanese Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese Welsh Yiddish
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 67

Thread: Fx5 problems

  1. #31
    Bullshark ecoli73's Avatar
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Sunnyvale, CA
    Last Activity
    Today 5:12 PM
    Posts
    3,291
    For better circulation, just at a power head...better than the spray bar anyway.


    Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app





  2. #32
    Senegal Bichir 13razorbackfan's Avatar
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Arkansas
    Last Activity
    02-11-2013 6:05 PM
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by F1 VET View Post
    I agree with the hosing issue, all you need is 1" Id hosing, and the stock ribbed hosing slows down gph as well. Here's a 15$ way of adding performance to your fx5, plus the clear hosing makes it just look cool too!







    I like the spray bar idea but I feel like all the 90degree bends hinder the flow, less bends, less length equals more flow and with my fx5 on a 125 I need all the gph I can get
    __________________________________________________ ________________

    Go S.Vettel #1 RB8 3X WDC!!!!!!!!!


    >http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/fo...itrate!-POTHOS
    The vinyl hose you are using isn't re-enforced? The reason I am asking is the bend it makes over the tank would likely cause as much GPH loss as a 90 degree sweeping 3/4" elbows. I haven't tested GPH with the spray bar but I doubt it is much less than with that dual nozzle that comes with the filter. I was looking for better spread and stronger current but keep in mind I have mine running on a smaller tank. I know the current with the spray bar versus the nozzle is so much better it really shows what this filter is capable of doing. I think also what makes the spray bar more effective as far as current is the pressure it creates like putting your finger over a water hose tip. So I imagine that would sacrifice GPH a bit but probably only marginally. I would be interested to either run a GPH test on this myself or if someone else already has I would be interested in seeing the numbers. Cool stuff.



  3. #33
    Wels Catfish Bderick67's Avatar
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Real Name
    Brian
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    16,505
    Quote Originally Posted by 13razorbackfan View Post
    Yeah....I use a braided reinforced vinyl tubing from my FX5 to my custom spray bar. Makes a HUGE difference in current and surface agitation. The main issue I have with the FX5 is the dual nozzle. It does nothing to help display the power this filter really has. I know when I first made the spray bar and hooked it up I was shocked at the difference in current in my tank. Shocked is an understatement.
    So with the reinforced vinyl tubing you can make the 180* over the rim like the factory tubing?
    "What you've posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having to read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."




  4. #34
    THE serrasalmus rhom F1 VET's Avatar
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Real Name
    Bearded Alan
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    INDY
    Last Activity
    05-17-2013 11:12 AM
    Posts
    5,282
    Quote Originally Posted by 13razorbackfan View Post
    The vinyl hose you are using isn't re-enforced? The reason I am asking is the bend it makes over the tank would likely cause as much GPH loss as a 90 degree sweeping 3/4" elbows. I haven't tested GPH with the spray bar but I doubt it is much less than with that dual nozzle that comes with the filter. I was looking for better spread and stronger current but keep in mind I have mine running on a smaller tank. I know the current with the spray bar versus the nozzle is so much better it really shows what this filter is capable of doing. I think also what makes the spray bar more effective as far as current is the pressure it creates like putting your finger over a water hose tip. So I imagine that would sacrifice GPH a bit but probably only marginally. I would be interested to either run a GPH test on this myself or if someone else already has I would be interested in seeing the numbers. Cool stuff.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bderick67 View Post
    So with the reinforced vinyl tubing you can make the 180* over the rim like the factory tubing?


    Regular 1" vinyl kinks if you do anything more then a 90, so my intake tube is mounted on the front glass pane to avoid a huge bend and kink, and the output hose is right on the water line so there is no bend < then 50ish degrees plus no dual outputs just a straight 1" pipe, the tubes look like a C from the canister to the tank, not necessarily the most pretty way but in terms of performance I have no significant bends and my flow is noticeably increased!

    I'm out of town so I will show you pics on Monday, and I'm not sure if the reinforced pipe can bend 90 or not.

    __________________________________________________ ________________

    Go S.Vettel #1 RB8 3X WDC!!!!!!!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by RWaltman View Post
    Well, I just learned something useful on this site...there's a first! KAKAAAAW! ON IT.
    >http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/fo...itrate!-POTHOS



  5. #35
    Wels Catfish Bderick67's Avatar
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Real Name
    Brian
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    16,505
    I either have to have the factory 180* or would have to build something outta PVC 90s. So most likely just stick with stock.
    "What you've posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having to read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."




  6. #36
    Senegal Bichir 13razorbackfan's Avatar
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Arkansas
    Last Activity
    02-11-2013 6:05 PM
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by Bderick67 View Post
    So with the reinforced vinyl tubing you can make the 180* over the rim like the factory tubing?
    No but I think it is more rigid so the bend isn't as restrictive.



  7. #37
    Senegal Bichir 13razorbackfan's Avatar
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Arkansas
    Last Activity
    02-11-2013 6:05 PM
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by F1 VET View Post
    Regular 1" vinyl kinks if you do anything more then a 90, so my intake tube is mounted on the front glass pane to avoid a huge bend and kink, and the output hose is right on the water line so there is no bend < then 50ish degrees plus no dual outputs just a straight 1" pipe, the tubes look like a C from the canister to the tank, not necessarily the most pretty way but in terms of performance I have no significant bends and my flow is noticeably increased!

    I'm out of town so I will show you pics on Monday, and I'm not sure if the reinforced pipe can bend 90 or not.

    __________________________________________________ ________________

    Go S.Vettel #1 RB8 3X WDC!!!!!!!!!


    >http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/fo...itrate!-POTHOS
    I am very interested in seeing some pics when you get a chance. Thanks



  8. #38
    Datnoid
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Montana
    Last Activity
    02-06-2013 6:15 PM
    Posts
    320
    You would think the engineers at Hagen would see these issues also and correct the problems?? After all is it not the job of the engineer to design new models and correct problems with current models I think thats what they are paid for. You folks with a good mind for improvements should be getting paid by Hagen for doing something they should be doing on there own? With few exceptions as you will have a occational bad unit the filter should do all this right out of the box not be reengineered to make it work at its full potential or at the very least make these available as aftermarket options. I have never been hidden,I'm not a fan of this filter but I use two until I get rich or have a windfall so to say



  9. #39
    Wels Catfish Bderick67's Avatar
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Real Name
    Brian
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    16,505
    Quote Originally Posted by hawkerw View Post
    You would think the engineers at Hagen would see these issues also and correct the problems?? After all is it not the job of the engineer to design new models and correct problems with current models I think thats what they are paid for. You folks with a good mind for improvements should be getting paid by Hagen for doing something they should be doing on there own? With few exceptions as you will have a occational bad unit the filter should do all this right out of the box not be reengineered to make it work at its full potential or at the very least make these available as aftermarket options. I have never been hidden,I'm not a fan of this filter but I use two until I get rich or have a windfall so to say
    Why? The filter sells just fine as it is. With the majority of owner being completely satisfied with it. Hagen would be stupid in a business sense to mess with it.
    "What you've posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having to read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."




  10. #40
    Datnoid
    Usergroup
    MFK members
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Montana
    Last Activity
    02-06-2013 6:15 PM
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by Bderick67 View Post
    Why? The filter sells just fine as it is. With the majority of owner being completely satisfied with it. Hagen would be stupid in a business sense to mess with it.
    Sorry!!! I can never remember which forums are the ones where theres a ton a fans that are die hard YEAH!!!!FX5 Is the UBER Filter!!!! when in truth it has many issues, havn't you been reading the post of this forum lately or do I read another lanuage? Why do you not see all these posts that are asking about 2262 problems or Rena problems but you see a FX5 issue on this forum almost daily. I was trying above to nicely say that people like Razor and others who have made all these improvements should get credit. If I was with Hagen I'd be looking to fix a filter that seems to have many design flaws just as it is or do I need to stuff some duct tape in one of the trays to stop the massive bypass. I'm sorry I am the first to say I'm at fault and I don't like to be rude, but at the same time I call a spade a spade and don't pretend it's perfect with no issues when there are many!!!! I own two FX5 until I can afford the Eheims to replace them. And no even the Eheims are not perfect.



Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •