After tax returns I'm planning on adding another aquarium. I'm debating on the two because they essentially cost the same at the LFS. The tank will be housing frontosa, likely 12-15 of them. Which do you think would be better suited to a colony? Dimensions I believe are 72" x 36" x 27" on the 300 vs 84" x 24" x 30" on the 265. I very much doubt that I'll be adding anything aside from the fronts. Thanks for any thoughts.
300dd or 265?
- Thread starter axs377
- Start date
Deep dimension tanks are the bomb. In my travels ill take a 40 breeder over a 55g any day. Depth makes or breaks a tank. Its the difference between living in a room and living In a hallway.
I'd go 300dd any day of the week. Deep tanks are what it's all about.
Sent from my SCH-R950 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
I'd go 300dd any day of the week. Deep tanks are what it's all about.
Sent from my SCH-R950 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
If you can fit it in the door, 300DD is the way to go. Loved my 265, but would have preferred the DD.
Since frontosas are the focus, I'd go with the longer tank for the sake of territory, but that's just me.
300DD, overall a larger foot print meaning more space for the fish more opportunities. Was just at my local mini pet store and they had one there it looked great.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Sent from my SCH-I605 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
