Deep sea fish species on the brink of extinction

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

shekes

Jessica Rabbit
MFK Member
Aug 14, 2005
626
1
0
45
Toon Town
'Critical danger' warning on fish

Deep sea fish species in the northern Atlantic are on the brink of extinction, new research suggests.

Canadian scientists studied five deep water species including hake and eel.

Writing in the journal Nature, they say that some populations have plummeted by 98% in a generation, meeting the definition of 'critically endangered'.

Scientists and conservation bodies are pressing for a global moratorium on deep-sea fishing which they regard as particularly destructive.

Some fleets have switched to deep-sea fisheries following the collapse in more commonly-caught species such as cod.

Known as bottom-trawling, ships often use heavy trawls which are dragged across the ocean floor, destroying coral and other ecosystems.

Click here to see how bottom trawling works

Conservation groups have lobbied hard in recent years for a global moratorium.

The most recent attempt to get a moratorium adopted, at the UN General Assembly last November, failed.

The new study, led by Jennifer Devine of Memorial University in Newfoundland, has produced further evidence that these fishing methods can have big ecological impacts.

The five species studied are all slow to grow and reproduce, attaining sexual maturity only in their teens.

"Deep sea fish are highly vulnerable to disturbance because of their late maturation, extreme longevity, low fecundity and slow growth," the researchers write.

They examined records from Canadian Atlantic waters spanning the period 1978-1994 - roughly a single generation.

They found that populations of roundnose grenadier, onion-eye grenadier, blue hake, spiny eel and spinytail skate all declined spectacularly over the period.

Populations fell by between 87% and 98%; projections show that some would be completely eliminated within three generations.

These statistics would place the five fish within the category of "critically endangered", as defined by IUCN, the World Conservation Union, which publishes the Red List of threatened species.

"Conservation measures are necessary and lack of knowledge must not delay appropriate initiatives, including the establishment of deep sea protected areas," the researchers conclude.

BBC

also read THIS THREAD
 
ouch!!!!!!! thats not good. who knows how bad the conditions down there really are. after all these years of dumping into the oceans. all of our waste eventually runs to the water. we need to clean up our act or we will be past the point of no return before long!!
 
The survey could be flawed. it was canadians afterall who did the study hahah
 
Well anyways its something people should pay attention too, yes fish are tasty, but you wont be eating them much longer if you keep destroying everything! I wish people just werent so effin distructive frankly I liked to enjoy everything while I am here not it go before me =(
 
Would this mean that some of these species would be listed under the CITES 1 appendix if they are really in that critical danger?
 
The European Commission (EC) is proposing fishing catches be cut by up to 50% in an effort to safeguard threatened stocks of cod and hake. EC scientists say overfishing in the North Sea is now so severe that just three out of 10 cod reach maturity. When i was in Spain in the Oct. i went to a fish market and they wee selling Hake at about 8in well under the Uk size. Consumption of smaller size hake has increased. This has lead to an increase in prices for smaller hake and to an increase in exploitation, especially in Spain, the principal producer and consumer of hake in Europe. By-catches and landings of undersize hake is a key characteristic of the Spanish fishery.


Angel Pousada was found guilty of illegally taking £42,000 worth of hake back to Spain, unrecorded in his logbook. Falmouth magistrates fined him £300. (S Telegraph 12/4/98)


not a bad a £45.000 for a £300 fine or rob a bank for 10k and do Years.........
 
riggs said:
if we've not already gone beyond!!

We have several years ago: read this

From an anyhow objective perspective, the destruction of life on planet Earth by Homo Sapiens has gone beyond what would justify the existence of this species altogether. It is only because we ourselves are members of this species that we manage to convince ourserlves that we are worth living.

It is pretty obvious that an objective obsererver would come to a conclusion that humans are a plague in a blink of an eye.

Interestingly, despite the fact that our life forms are getting extinct and even our bio-space desintegrating, our financial markets keep rising in value. What we have today is supposed to be worth more than ever and will be worth even more tomorrow.

Now imagine an ET real estate agent assesing the values of cosmical objects.
In his objective view, what do you think this planet would have been worth 500 years ago in his intergallactic currency?
What do you think it would be worth today?

Do you think our financial markets allow for this depreciation?
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com