bingo! live food is live food. why is a small goldfish ok but not a GT? a fish is a fish, who are we to decide which one should get eaten? the more expensive and prettier one? this rationalization doesnt make any sense to me. if you choose to feed live foods, who the hell cares what kind of fish it isbenzjamin13;3149953;3149953 said:The problem here is not just a fish being torn to bits by other fish, but people also put value on certain fish. I for one, feel that a fish is a fish regardless of price. They are all "Feeders" regardless of species. Some people think that because it's a more than a dollar, that the fish is worth living and not a feeder. There are many different views on this and I don't agree that because it was a GT, it would be more cruel than a large Goldfish.

benzjamin13;3149953; said:The problem here is not just a fish being torn to bits by other fish, but people also put value on certain fish. I for one, feel that a fish is a fish regardless of price. They are all "Feeders" regardless of species. Some people think that because it's a more than a dollar, that the fish is worth living and not a feeder. There are many different views on this and I don't agree that because it was a GT, it would be more cruel than a large Goldfish.
jcardona1;3149984; said:bingo! live food is live food. why is a small goldfish ok but not a GT? a fish is a fish, who are we to decide which one should get eaten? the more expensive and prettier one? this rationalization doesnt make any sense to me. if you choose to feed live foods, who the hell cares what kind of fish it is![]()