I'd advocate really expensive permits, if the current $500 for a permit application doesn't cover the widespread use and monitoring of such permits, raise it I say. I'm pretty sure people would pay a pretty penny to keep stingrays in states where they're normally illegal. I'm not for widespread ban repeals, but why not allow those willing to shell out for f&w to monitor them while keeping fw stingrays to do so if they can offset costs.I fully see where Matt is coming from. But we all know situations where f&w, be they european, us or anywhere else, do not know how to deal with the issue without euthanasia. I have seen it here qith Lions, i have seen it in Hong Kong with people taking aro's to europe, etc, etc...
Say that one hobbyist has some illegal stock. Even so, odds are he is the best suited person to keep them untill they die ( that can be monitored ). Why the need to rehome? If someone has a ray, why the need to rehome said ray? What ensures it will be best cared for in the new place?
Why the useif atomic weapons for an issue that coild be dealt with a sling?
That is what i do not understand and consider a waste of resources, no matter the way one elians it.
Am talking about fish. A talking aout responsible owners who know husbandry.
Am not getting into dangerous animals and badly maintained animals.
Sent from my iPad using MonsterAquariaNetwork app