peta and fishing

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
http://www.peta.org.uk/issues/animals-not-eat/fish/

Back to the discussion at hand. Again not a big time fishermen but my son and i would fish at a lake stocked with catfish...he would catch the same exact fish over and over again. We did flatten the barbs though. Doesnt tha conflict with what the aurhor of the article is stating
Hello; I did not read the article so will comment only on catching the same fish more than once. I have done this also.
Sometimes I catch a fish that still has some else's hook in it. If it is a barbed hook it is sometimes best to not try to pull it free. What I try to do is cut as much of the hook away as I can reach with some nippers.
The tale I have been told is that the hook will be slowly degraded by immersion in the water or by the body of the fish. I have no actual knowledge of this being true. May be just another one of the stories passed around to make us feel better about breaking off a line with a hooked fish. Also may be true. What I can say is these fish usually were feeding and looked ok. No doubt they were bothered by the hook, but were getting along.
This was one of the reasons I stopped with live bait as artificial lures are seldom taken deep at all. I also bend the barb down on my hooks which makes them easy to remove and does much less damage.

It took me too long to semi-master a fly rod and to learn to tie my own flies to be willing to give up fishing. I am willing to try to reduce my impact. I also buy a fishing permit which helps fund my states wildlife programs.

We people are the top predators any where we are. Our technology has allowed us to spread pretty much everywhere and that technology also has allowed us to overpopulate. While I do not have the numbers it is my guess that sport fishing impact is tiny when compared to the impact of commercial fishing. Don't get me wrong I am for sustainable sport fishing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaws7777
The only real problem I have with commercialized anything when it comes to food animals is waste.
The pictures of the fishing boats overflowing with dying fish doesn't bother me except that only a certain percentage of those animals will be used. I don't pretend to know the numbers because I just do not.
But at any grocery store you can witness them throwing food that hasn't been bought passed date,whatever, in dumpsters. This also goes for meat!

At least the majority of hunters and fishermen that are taking for their own consumption are not wasting their kills. Again I don't know the numbers but I know a lot of people around here that appreciate the animals they take and if it a deer or a pig that's too large for their family they share it with others, It doesn't go to waste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GamerChick5567
The only real problem I have with commercialized anything when it comes to food animals is waste.
The pictures of the fishing boats overflowing with dying fish doesn't bother me except that only a certain percentage of those animals will be used. I don't pretend to know the numbers because I just do not.
But at any grocery store you can witness them throwing food that hasn't been bought passed date,whatever, in dumpsters. This also goes for meat!

At least the majority of hunters and fishermen that are taking for their own consumption are not wasting their kills. Again I don't know the numbers but I know a lot of people around here that appreciate the animals they take and if it a deer or a pig that's too large for their family they share it with others, It doesn't go to waste.

Was at a wawa the other day and saw the workers throwing away perfectly good donuts
 
Was at a wawa the other day and saw the workers throwing away perfectly good donuts
Hello; many years ago the school cafeteria at Grays Knob Kentucky would let a local pig farmer collect the food scraps. You did not have to see his old pickup to know it was around, the smell preceded it. He had two or three big barrels always in the back. For some reason that was stopped and the food was sent to a landfill. Well anyway it will be generating plenty of methane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GamerChick5567
Hello; many years ago the school cafeteria at Grays Knob Kentucky would let a local pig farmer collect the food scraps. You did not have to see his old pickup to know it was around, the smell preceded it. He had two or three big barrels always in the back. For some reason that was stopped and the food was sent to a landfill. Well anyway it will be generating plenty of methane.
Hello; many years ago the school cafeteria at Grays Knob Kentucky would let a local pig farmer collect the food scraps. You did not have to see his old pickup to know it was around, the smell preceded it. He had two or three big barrels always in the back. For some reason that was stopped and the food was sent to a landfill. Well anyway it will be generating plenty of methane.
The smell must have been rancid.

I once saw an episode of undercover boss where the ceo of 711 saw the same practice of throwing away bread and donuts everyday and was appaled by it. He found out later that this order came frpm corporate headquarters he then chamged it and had the leftover sent to food kitchens and shelters
 
  • Like
Reactions: GamerChick5567
Since we are on a nonsense rants I might as well get in on this.
So this is more on the hunting aspect but hear me out, you will either think this is funny or be angry with me.
Ok so here we go. If we are on this whole thing of animals having more rights should we not look into the fact that we are basing the gender of the animal not the way they feel inside. So here is my thought if I am out hunting and all I have is a doe tag but I see a huge 10 point buck and have a perfect shot should i take the shot? I cant say that as the buck was growing up he hasn't always long to be a doe and get mounted by a big strong buck it the rut and have a fawn of its own. Now I'm in a moral dilemma if I should shot or not. I don't think that excuse would go over well with the game warden but hey you can't judge right!

Some of these post don't make sense to me but I think I get what your saying. Get a is not happy because they are tree huging hippies that feel that they need to voice there opinion every time you turn around. Yes I do agree with some of the things they say but dam they are getting ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GamerChick5567
I'm assuming this is just in jest.
Wouldn't this defeat the purpose of using tags to manage the deer populations?
 
Since we are on a nonsense rants I might as well get in on this.
So this is more on the hunting aspect but hear me out, you will either think this is funny or be angry with me.
Ok so here we go. If we are on this whole thing of animals having more rights should we not look into the fact that we are basing the gender of the animal not the way they feel inside. So here is my thought if I am out hunting and all I have is a doe tag but I see a huge 10 point buck and have a perfect shot should i take the shot? I cant say that as the buck was growing up he hasn't always long to be a doe and get mounted by a big strong buck it the rut and have a fawn of its own. Now I'm in a moral dilemma if I should shot or not. I don't think that excuse would go over well with the game warden but hey you can't judge right!

Some of these post don't make sense to me but I think I get what your saying. Get a is not happy because they are tree huging hippies that feel that they need to voice there opinion every time you turn around. Yes I do agree with some of the things they say but dam they are getting ridiculous.

You are you advocating for gender equality for deer? I like this idea.

Now the deer will start fighting over where millerskid buck goes to the bathroom
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com