I believe many aquarists have a somewhat exaggerated expectation of what a few Pothos plants, (or other terrestrial species) have the ability remove in the nitrate department. If a few large Pothos plants remove more than a 10th of a part per million I'd be surprised.
In my Panamanian biotope tank I have about 6 of these dieffenbachia (below) hanging on the surface, and still do 30%-40% every other day water changes to keep nitrate at my goal of <5ppm.

When you compare volume of plant life to animal life in nature, where in pristine waters nitrate is in the 1ppm or less range, plants overwhelm.

Above the rio Pedro Miguel in Panama. The water looks questionable, but when tested had undetectable nitrate concentrations, I assume the surrounding fauna sucked nitrate and other nutrients out as fast as it was produced.
For the OP, I like the idea suggested of using a smaller tank for a separate planted refugium (especially with Central American Cichlids) because of their tendency to destroy most rooted aquatic plants, not only by eating them, but also just clearing swaths of territorial space.
While a nitrate concentration of 20ppm does not kill cichlids outright, it often contributes to chronic diseases like hole in the head, or bloat over time, and a very heavily planted tank or sump could help mitigate the high nitrate tap water.
Without that type mitigation (even though I prefer to keep mainly cichlids), it might be a better idea to keep some of the large swamp dwelling Anabantids that tolerate nitrates well, like Combtails (Belontia), or climbing perch (Anabas) or giant Bettas. These fish are similar in appearance, size, and aggressiveness to cichlids, and fill a similar niche in high nitrate Asian waters.
Beside the heavy terrestrial planting in my 180 main tank, I use a heavily planted 125 gal as a sump/refugim as a nitrate sponge.
