260 Filtration Idea Help and Advice Needed.

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

ozzyboo

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Sep 25, 2010
190
0
0
Surrey-UK
Firstl sorry for the very long post please bear with it :popcorn:
I was originally going to use canister filters on this new tank, as I wanted a silent system with less chance of floods than a sump and no pipe work or heaters visible in the display area, all plumbed in through the base via bulkheads with inline heaters and UV hard plumbed through canister returns. The eheim canisters I was planning on using were the 2078e or 2080, the 2080 are too tall to be able to effectively plumb anything to and from what I have read the microchip control on the 2078’s does not like anything plumbed inline and unless you run it in manual mode the flow is severely affected, I also wanted something that was easy to maintain and clean hence the pro 3’s as they have the pre filter at the top. The entire in tank plumbing was going to be hidden behind a background so nothing in display area. Also after looking at the actual flow rates of the eheims with media and head the best I was going to get out of the 2078’s was around 1000 LPH with nothing connected inline, 700LPH with inline heater, and considering the 2080 have a pump that has 100 LPH less the 2078’s I cant see them putting out anymore. I would need three to get over 3x turnover which starts making the whole thing rather expensive at about £250 per filter.

Now I know that I can get significantly more LPH and media capacity for my money by using a sump, a sump certainly fulfils the requirement of nothing in the display area. But the two other requirements may be more difficult to sort out, it must be silent or as near as and as leak proof as possible.

This is just a rough idea at the moment that I am hoping to turn into a more finished idea with your help. Firstly I don’t really want to use a weir, I know big panic with floods, I am planning to put my outlets x 2, easier to make quite?, for the sump 6-7” below the surface,27” water depth, there will also be an under substrate jet system pushing waste towards the sump outlets, I intend to drill the sump with an overflow connected direct to the house drainage so in the event of a power failure the drain down from the tank will just flow down the drain and stop once it reaches the outlets still leaving 20” of water in the tank, the tank will also have a drain straight to house drainage, one so I can set up an auto water change system and two to function as an emergency drain to stop the tank flooding. The auto water change will not be connected to the power in any way it will just run through a HMA and inline heater into the tank via a drip system 4 GPH so this would replenish some of the water lost due to power failure whilst power is off. Not sure how viable an idea this is although it does seem to be fail safe regarding leaks I think. By using this or similar system I can get 5 x turnover no problem for a lot less money. The sump will be 4ft and around 220 litres and can be built any way as it is just an old tank at present.

This may not even be possible and I may have to use weirs within the tank but this is not what I want, I equally don’t want to cause any hardship to my fish, and if it was a choice between a weir and causing problems for the fish it is a no brainer I would have to put a weir in, the display space is very important to me that it has the bare minimum in it.

I would greatly appreciate any views on any of the above any comments, constructive criticisms or ideas on if this is viable or to make it better as this needs to be right the first time.
Thanks in advance.
 
In my opinion, if a tank doesn't already have a weir or weirs built into it, setting it up with a sump is more trouble than it's worth. And if one of your priorities is a leak/accident proof setup, weirs are the best, simplest route to go if you do use a sump.

Have you considered FX5s? Lots and lots of flow (I clocked mine at 2400lph full of media), more energy efficient than Eheims, more media volume than you could possibly need, and a heck of a lot cheaper than Eheim Pro 3s. 3 FX5s could be turning your 260g tank over about 7.3 times an hour, 2 of them about 4.8 times an hour.
 
Burto;4748265; said:
In my opinion, if a tank doesn't already have a weir or weirs built into it, setting it up with a sump is more trouble than it's worth. And if one of your priorities is a leak/accident proof setup, weirs are the best, simplest route to go if you do use a sump.

Have you considered FX5s? Lots and lots of flow (I clocked mine at 2400lph full of media), more energy efficient than Eheims, more media volume than you could possibly need, and a heck of a lot cheaper than Eheim Pro 3s. 3 FX5s could be turning your 260g tank over about 7.3 times an hour, 2 of them about 4.8 times an hour.

+1, i just placed an order for one to use with my 125 SA tank, cant wait for the tide pool..:naughty: :ROFL:
sumps can and will most likely be a pain in the butt if you dont know what youre doing with them, and like you worry about, can flood the house, so fx5's or if u can afford it, an eheim 2262 or 2 would be amazing :D :nilly:
 
Burto;4748265; said:
Have you considered FX5s? Lots and lots of flow (I clocked mine at 2400lph full of media), more energy efficient than Eheims, more media volume than you could possibly need, and a heck of a lot cheaper than Eheim Pro 3s. 3 FX5s could be turning your 260g tank over about 7.3 times an hour, 2 of them about 4.8 times an hour.

Yes I had thought about the FX5 but having seen so many people online have problems with theres it kind of put me off.Also both of the eheims I was considering use less electricity than the FX5,2078 10-35 watts 2080 45 watts FX5 50 watts,also having used eheims for a number of years I have found them to be reliable and very quite both of which are important to me.Also I wonder what effect connecting a UV inline and a heater inline would have on the FX5 flow rate as if I am using canisters I would need at least 2 300 watt heaters connected inline and the UV.

sumps can and will most likely be a pain in the butt if you dont know what youre doing with them, and like you worry about, can flood the house, so fx5's or if u can afford it, an eheim 2262 or 2 would be amazing

I am fairly confident that the setup would not flood the house as the two overflows to the main drainage would stop that happening,my main reasoning is wanting to keep as much of the dispaly area available is just that I want the display area uncluttered with anything if at all possible,But if need be I will fit a centre weir for using a sump.I have covered my veiw of the FX5 above and the eheim 2262 does not seem to be a model that is available in the UK the 2260 is the biggest i can find.This tank needs to be as easy to maintain as possible hence wanting filters that do not require complete strip down to get at the pre filter pad which all of the eheims do except the pro 3's,by using a sump I could use 2 inlets both with filter socks and the socks just need changing once a week the socks are very easy to access no filter to dimantle.I have no idea how easy the FX5 are to clean but have seen anumber of people complain the filter clogs quite easily and needs cleaning to get flow back to what it should be.Yes I know that they can be moded but I cant see hagen be to pleased if they need returning under warranty so that could not be done for the first 12 months.

Thanks for taking the time to reply as any input is welcome.I think that the sump is the way to go,both on a cost basis and the maintanance issues.If there has to be a weir then that is the case was just trying to see if others thought the above idea was viable and would work
 
Very surprised to hear the 2262 is not available in the UK.

I replaced my 12 year old 2260 (still running strong, quiet, and all original) with a 2262 last year.

At that time I was told the 2260 was discontinued 1-2 years ago, and replaced by the 2262.

Personally I chose to stay with canisters due to noise and smell concerns.

Good luck with your filtration choise.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com