I had posted about an ID back when this guy was a 2''er and everyone said to wait until he was a 5''+ specimen. Well its that time. Thanks alot
A ID please
- Thread starter hybridtheoryd16
- Start date
Please explain why these pics are bad for an ID? And what type of pics would be best ?bigspizz;3193665; said:
This is the only full shot I have on hand. When I look at it all I can see is the scratches. Its just a normal 220. The big guy is out in the pic so the bass is hiding in the plants. There is also another pic that maybe better for ID.troutking;3193717; said:
The last pic is tremendous. After seeing the second to last, I can tell you the reflection of the other tank made the first pics distorted, and overexposed looking. An ID pic should be clear. Hope that helps that is all I was trying to do.
I would post a pic like this for an ID...(my camera cost 90.00 cheapest available) I was not taking a shot, just constructive criticism. Good pic, just not for an ID.
I would post a pic like this for an ID...(my camera cost 90.00 cheapest available) I was not taking a shot, just constructive criticism. Good pic, just not for an ID.
i get what your saying now. Its rough to get a clear pic with a phone. So I ran them thru a edit software and over did the highlight. Plus 8 tanks in a room with all the lights on makes for bad pics as well. Thanks alotbigspizz;3194765; said: