I would be careful to word specifics. Melafix is not really an all-purpose ailment. That's like saying it is the cure to all issues we have when it is not. It can aid recovery of shallow wounds but not necessarily prevent bacterial infections. If you see ulcerated wounds that are clearly bacterial, would you think Melafix is an answer to this? How about problems with their respiratory functions? Would Melafix answer this trouble or simply add more harm to the fish in question? Every fish is different as aclockworkorange rightly pointed out. They have varying degrees of tolerance towards different environmental conditions. Oscars are tough in several instances but not BGKs.fishkeeper4244;4853104; said:looks like the fins are messed up too. give it doses of melafix for a week. melafix is an all-purpose ailment and it is also good for already healthy fish. saved my oscars life.
I wonder where they got that claim that bacteria can thrive on glass. The anaerobic bacteria, if this is what they are referring to, prefer stagnant areas. There is no way this bacteria can thrive in a barebottom setup with oxygen free flowing around and general cleaning of the tank will prevent bad bacteria from even attempting to establish itself. That's the purpose of hospitalizing the fish. I still disagree using sand for hospital purposes.aclockworkorange;4855907; said:I have personally used kanamycin, maracyn 1 and 2, melafix and pimafix for a bacterial infection on a BGK. The kanamcyin worked the best with my fish to clear up a columnaris infection and seemed the most "gentle" (even though it's a fairly harsh antibiotic).
Lupin, I have found BGK's to prefer sand in general, and know is some instances people claim bacteria can thrive on the glass of a bare-bottom tank (why a lot of Cory breeders keep the babys on a thin lair of sand, supposedly). What do you think about this in this situation?