bull head catfish questions??

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
I know of a lake that only has bullheads and lmb...the bass are all fat and healthy. I've never heard that bullheads are bad?
 
HORSE ****, it really depends on the body of water and the other present species.
 
Most people say that they are bad because they root through the bottom and stir up mud. If anything they help by eating dead and decaying matter in the body of water by eating it or else would just sit and rot.
 
That makes no sense at all, as long as they are a native species it would have nothing but a productive impact on the necessary food chain order. they have a distinct role that they play a big part in keeping in check.
 
They will not harm the enviroment in areas they are native. Some areas out West they are not native and should not be stocked.
 
warmouth;4324382; said:
They will not harm the enviroment in areas they are native. Some areas out West they are not native and should not be stocked.


even in these areas, they will not have a huge impact on the environment. They would simply be replacing most of the duties that other species of catfish preform. Also, they are not an invasive species that would make any other native it's prey and wipe out a fish population.
 
Kevin the Black Bullheads and others along with largemouth bass have caused the decline and extirpation of many chubs and pupfish out west....Im not sure where you got your info. but this is from the USFWS.
Means of Introduction: Intentionally stocked for sport and as a food fish. In Idaho, it was probably accidentally stocked with brown bullhead A. nebulosus or with channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Linder 1963).

Status: Established in most locations where introduced. Apparently not established in Connecticut (Whitworth 1996). A single report from Massachusetts in the 1940s (Hartel 1992).

Impact of Introduction: Introduced black bullhead eat endangered humpback chubs Gila cypha in the Little Colorado River, and may exert a major negative effect on the population there (Marsh and Douglas 1997). Minckley (1973) reported that this species is generally considered a pest in Arizona as it forms large stunted populations that compete with more desirable fishes for space and food. Black bullheads are voracious predators of newly hatched gamefish (Whitmore 1997). Introduced predatory fishes, including the black bullhead, are likely at least partially responsible for the decline of the Chiricahua leopard frog Rana chiricahuensis in southeastern Arizona (Rosen et al. 1995).

Remarks: Although the black bullhead has not been reported from South Carolina, it is probable that it has been introduced into the state. Tyus et al. (1982) gave a distribution map of the this species in the upper Colorado basin. Occurrence in Maryland is not listed by Lee et al. (1976, 1981) or Rohde et al. (1994). Becker (1983) states that in Wisconsin the black bullhead's distribution is much more extensive now than it was in the mid-1920s, especially in northern Wisconsin.

References


Anonymous 2001. Oregon's Warm Water Fishing with Public Access. [online]. URL at http://www.dfw.state.or.us/ODFwhtml/FishText/WWFishing/WWFishAL.html.
Becker, G. C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
Behnke, R. J., and R. M. Wetzel. 1960. A preliminary list of the fishes found in the fresh waters of Connecticut. Copeia 1960(2):141--143.
Bradley, W.G. and J.E. Deacon. 1967. The biotic communities of southern Nevada. Nevada State Museum Anthropological Papers No. 13, Part 4. 201-273.

Brown, C. J. D. 1971. Fishes of Montana. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Burkhead, N. M., R. E. Jenkins, and E. G. Maurakis. 1980. New records, distribution and diagnostic characters of Virginia ictalurid catfishes with an adnexed adipose fin. Brimleyana 4:75--93.
Cross, F. B. 1967. Handbook of Fishes of Kansas. State Biological Survey and University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Miscellaneous Publication 45, Topeka, KS.
Dahlberg, M. D., and D. C. Scott. 1971b. Introductions of freshwater fishes in Georgia. Bulletin of the Georgia Academy of Science 29:245--252.
Deacon, J. E., and J. E. Williams. 1984. Annotated list of the fishes of Nevada. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 97(1):103--118.
Etnier, D. A., and W. C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN.
Everhart, W. H., and W. R. Seaman. 1971. Fishes of Colorado. Colorado Game, Fish and Parks Division, Denver, CO. 75 pp.
Fletcher, D. - Warmwater Fisheries Resource Manager, Washington Department of Wildlife, Olympia, WA. Response to NBS-G nonindigenous questionaire and other reports. 1992.
Hartel, K. E. 1992. Non-native fishes known from Massachusetts freshwaters. Occasional Reports of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Fish Department, Cambridge, MA. 2. September. pp. 1--9.
Hocutte, C.H., R.E. Jenkins, and J.R. Stauffer, Jr. 1986. Zoogeography of the Fishes of the Central Appalachians and Central Atlantic Coastal Plain. In C.H. Hocutt and E.O. Wiley, eds. The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes. 161-212.

Holton, G. D. 1990. A field guide to Montana fishes. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena, MT. 104 pp.
Hubbs, C., R. J. Edwards, and G. P. Garrett. 1991. An annotated checklist of freshwater fishes of Texas, with key to identification of species. Texas Journal of Science, Supplement 43(4):1--56.
Idaho Fish and Game. 1990. Fisheries Management Plan 1991--1995. Appendix I -- A list of Idaho fishes and their distribution by drainage. Idaho Fish and Game.
Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
Jones, D. J. 1963. A history of Nebraska's fisheries resources. Dingell-Hohnson Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Project F-4-R Publication. Nebraska Game, Forestation and Parks Commission.
Koster, W. J. 1957. Guide to the fishes of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.
Lampman, B. H. 1946. The coming of the pond fishes. Binfords and Mort, Portland, OR.

Lanigan, S. H. and C. R. Berry Jr. 1981. Distribution of Fishes in the White River, Utah. The Southwestern Naturalist, 26(4): 389-393.

La Rivers, I. 1962. Fishes and fisheries of Nevada. Nevada State Print Office, Carson City, NV.
Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980 et seq. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, NC.
Linder, A. D. 1963. Idaho's alien fishes. Tebiwa 6(2):12--15.
Marsh, P. C., and M. E. Douglas. 1997. Predation by introduced fishes on endangered humpback chub and other native species in the Little Colorado RIver, Arizona. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:343-346.
Matern, S.A., P.B. Moyle, and L.C. Pierce. 2002. Native and alien fishes in a California estuarine marsh: twenty-one years of changing assemblages. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 131: 797-816.
Menhinick, E. F. 1991. The freshwater fishes of North Carolina. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 227 pp.
Miller, R. R., and J. R. Alcorn. 1946. The introduced fishes of Nevada, with a history of their introduction. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 73:173--193.
Miller, R.R. and C.H. Lowe. 1967. Part 2. Fishes of Arizona, p 133-151, In: C.H. Lowe, ed. The Vertebrates of Arizona. University of Arizona Press. Tucson.
Minckley, W. L. 1973. Fishes of Arizona. Arizona Fish and Game Department. Sims Printing Company, Inc., Phoenix, AZ.
Moyle, P.B. and J. Randall. 1999. Distribution maps of fishes in California. [on-line] Available URL at http://ice.ucdavis.edu/aquadiv/fishcovs/fishmaps.html.
Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. The Peterson Field Guide Series, volume 42. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.
Platania, S. P. 1991. Fishes of the Rio Chama and upper Rio Grande, New Mexico, with preliminary comments on their longitudinal distribution. Southwestern Naturalist 36(2):186--193.

Schmidt, R. E. 1986. Zoogeography of the Northern Appalachians. In C.H. Hocutt and E.O. Wiley, eds. The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes. 137-160.

Sigler, W. F., and R. R. Miller. 1963. Fishes of Utah. Utah Department of Fish and Game, Salt Lake City, UT. 203 pp.
Simpson, J., and R. Wallace. 1978. Fishes of Idaho. University of Idaho Press, Moscow, ID.
Sommer, T, B. Harrell, M. Nobriga, R. Brown, P. Moyle, W. Kimmerer, and L. Schemel. 2001. California's Yolo Bypass: Evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries, wetlands, wildlife, and agriculture. Fisheries. American Fisheries Society. 26 (8): 6-16.
Sublette, J. E., M. D. Hatch, and M. Sublette. 1990. The fishes of New Mexico. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM. 393 pp.
Swift, C. C., T. R. Haglund, M. Ruiz, and R. N. Fisher. 1993. The status and distribution of the freshwater fishes of southern California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 92(3):101--167.
Tilmant, J.T. 1999. Management of nonindigenous aquatic fish in the U.S. National Park System. National Park Service. 50 pp.
Tyus, H. M., B. D. Burdick, R. A. Valdez, C. M. Haynes, T. A. Lytle, and C. R. Berry. 1982. Fishes of the upper Colorado River basin: distribution, abundance, and status. Pages 12--70 in W. H. Miller, H. M. Tyus, and C. A. Carlson, editors. Fishes of the upper Colorado River system: present and future, Western Division, American Fisheries Society.
Wydoski, R. S., and R. R. Whitney. 1979. Inland fishes of Washington. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.
 
gar man;4324355; said:
Most people say that they are bad because they root through the bottom and stir up mud. If anything they help by eating dead and decaying matter in the body of water by eating it or else would just sit and rot.

The catfish in any lake or pond serve an important function in the total health of the water they are in. I agree totally with gar man, which i really hate to do :ROFL:
 
warmouth;4324512; said:
Kevin the Black Bullheads and others along with largemouth bass have caused the decline and extirpation of many chubs and pupfish out west....Im not sure where you got your info. but this is from the USFWS.
Means of Introduction: Intentionally stocked for sport and as a food fish. In Idaho, it was probably accidentally stocked with brown bullhead A. nebulosus or with channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Linder 1963).

Status: Established in most locations where introduced. Apparently not established in Connecticut (Whitworth 1996). A single report from Massachusetts in the 1940s (Hartel 1992).

Impact of Introduction: Introduced black bullhead eat endangered humpback chubs Gila cypha in the Little Colorado River, and may exert a major negative effect on the population there (Marsh and Douglas 1997). Minckley (1973) reported that this species is generally considered a pest in Arizona as it forms large stunted populations that compete with more desirable fishes for space and food. Black bullheads are voracious predators of newly hatched gamefish (Whitmore 1997). Introduced predatory fishes, including the black bullhead, are likely at least partially responsible for the decline of the Chiricahua leopard frog Rana chiricahuensis in southeastern Arizona (Rosen et al. 1995).

Remarks: Although the black bullhead has not been reported from South Carolina, it is probable that it has been introduced into the state. Tyus et al. (1982) gave a distribution map of the this species in the upper Colorado basin. Occurrence in Maryland is not listed by Lee et al. (1976, 1981) or Rohde et al. (1994). Becker (1983) states that in Wisconsin the black bullhead's distribution is much more extensive now than it was in the mid-1920s, especially in northern Wisconsin.


i dont condone or agree with the stocking of any species to non-native areas, this is nothing more than what has happened in Florida and of course many other ares (Grass Carp is another good example), Invasives are a blight on us all, but where the fish are a natural occurrence and are within their native range, they are beneficial, and there for a reason, Its when man decides to try to improve on mother nature that we get into trouble
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com