Captive breeding of RARE fish ?????????????

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

santoury

Fire Eel
MFK Member
Dec 8, 2006
3,624
14
68
Massachusetts
Okay - with ALL of these ultra rare fish popping up (Mostly in Li's tanks!) why isn't anybody working on breeding programs? Nobody?
Even species that are easily bred in Asia aren't bred here - example : Giant Gouramis. They are just Gouramis for pete's sake. They have a well known breeding regime just like Tilapia in ponds.
My question is, why wouldn't more people promote the captive breeding of really rare fish (I'm excepting Cichlids here, because Cichlids are as a general rule, very easy in comparison.)

This would 1) lessen pressure on wild caught fish (except for mutations), 2) keep money within the USA, instead of international breeders profiting, 3) make RARE fish available to all of us MFK's, and 4) for the joy, experience, and learning of breeding fish that aren't bred often, if at all.

For example, there are quite a few species of concern, such as the black arowana, but nobody is "really" doing anything to create a captive breeding program. My question is... Why?

As for me, I'm working on building up a breeding group of Protopterus annectens, and already have enough specimens to do that. I have also just started collecting Osphronemus for the dual purpose of their awesome personalities, and to breed them in the USA.
 
And I meant to include all the new, crazy morphs - leucistic, xanthic, piebald, platinum and so on.
 
also most people don't have the money or space to do breeding on a large enough scale to actually make a impact
 
It might not be "rare" anymore but it would allow for more of us to be able to have them without enormous pockets.
Also, it doesn't have to be a HUGE scale operation to make an impact. Just think, if one species was bred ONCE, there would be approximately 20 to 200 more of said fish for US to enjoy.
And Li, aren't there enough "rare" fish?
 
a lot of fish are pretty difficult to start captive breeding... not saying it couldn't be done.
 
santoury;888681; said:
It might not be "rare" anymore but it would allow for more of us to be able to have them without enormous pockets.
Also, it doesn't have to be a HUGE scale operation to make an impact. Just think, if one species was bred ONCE, there would be approximately 20 to 200 more of said fish for US to enjoy.
And Li, aren't there enough "rare" fish?

Captive breeding would also take pressure off wild stocks, especially endangered species. Also would help restore wild populations.
 
Davo - Exactly - which is why more of us should be trying it, at least.
 
its a good idea, it really is, but breeding fish is expensive.
so those of us without "enormous pockets" cannot take on this endeavor.
it will have to be left up to those that already have the rare fish.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com