ewurm Aimara MFK Member Jan 27, 2006 28,496 79 132 16 * Apr 4, 2009 #1 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512560,00.html
A andyjs Jack Dempsey MFK Member Aug 13, 2008 2,765 4 36 37 Ohio Apr 5, 2009 #2 Oh that makes sense...he's fearing a gun ban, so he gives them more of a reason to ban them... That really is sad. Taking his anger out on anyone like that is insane, but 3 random innocent officers?
Oh that makes sense...he's fearing a gun ban, so he gives them more of a reason to ban them... That really is sad. Taking his anger out on anyone like that is insane, but 3 random innocent officers?
R RyanS Feeder Fish MFK Member Apr 11, 2006 112 0 0 44 Minnesota Apr 5, 2009 #3 I don't understand how SWAT could fire at him that much and he isn't dead. Armored vests can't stop rifle rounds. Nevertheless, it's sad.
I don't understand how SWAT could fire at him that much and he isn't dead. Armored vests can't stop rifle rounds. Nevertheless, it's sad.
N nigaharu Fire Eel MFK Member Feb 19, 2009 2,226 5 68 Where palm trees sway Apr 5, 2009 #4 This kind of news is becoming more frequent. HOw sad!
Aqua Sanctuary Fire Eel MFK Member Oct 22, 2007 1,199 10 68 41 The Internet www.myspace.com Apr 5, 2009 #5 this is terrible. In cases like this. I agree with strict gun screenings. But I honesly hope the citizen's are never disarmed.
this is terrible. In cases like this. I agree with strict gun screenings. But I honesly hope the citizen's are never disarmed.