Hello, recently there has been alot of contraversy reguaring the recently discovered polypterus species: sp.Dabola.
I was told there were 2 main types, one with the head markings of and endli and the body markings of a lap and the other a fish with lap head markings and endli body markings. Some people claim that they are natural accuring hybrids but this cant be true since fish farms in indonesia are breeding these and hybrids are known to be infertile. But the question is, some people claim that all endlis found in the dabola river are sp. Dabolas and some peopel claim that they are only sp. Dabola if they have the specific characteristics of the 2 fused polypterus. My question is, what is the exact standard that makes a sp.dabola a sp. Dabola? Is it the markings or only the locality. Are all endlis found in the dabola river called sp. Dabolas or is there a certain characteristic that makes them a sp.dabola? And also, has there been any dna tests done on the discovered sp.dabola speicies? Thank you. It would be awesome of you guys to answer
I was told there were 2 main types, one with the head markings of and endli and the body markings of a lap and the other a fish with lap head markings and endli body markings. Some people claim that they are natural accuring hybrids but this cant be true since fish farms in indonesia are breeding these and hybrids are known to be infertile. But the question is, some people claim that all endlis found in the dabola river are sp. Dabolas and some peopel claim that they are only sp. Dabola if they have the specific characteristics of the 2 fused polypterus. My question is, what is the exact standard that makes a sp.dabola a sp. Dabola? Is it the markings or only the locality. Are all endlis found in the dabola river called sp. Dabolas or is there a certain characteristic that makes them a sp.dabola? And also, has there been any dna tests done on the discovered sp.dabola speicies? Thank you. It would be awesome of you guys to answer

Interesting stuff. 