Festae- Quality VS Trash!!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

Freshwaterpredators

Peacock Bass
MFK Member
Apr 25, 2009
5,071
136
120
The Grotto
Hi everyone. Well first i'd like to start off with saying lets not get too nasty here, but we do have the right to freedom of speech and personal opinion. I would like to create a thread where everyone can discuss this dispute over festae being quality or not. Over the last year, I have heard alot about the majority of festae being sold in the hobby being considered trash. Remember everyone, there is a possibility of this thread hurting peoples feelings. The truth does hurt and i figured its about time to get things straight for everyone and keep the trash off the streets!!! SO lets try so be as respectful as possible and i dont see any harm in discussing where your fish was bought from or sold too; hobbiests or vendors.

Up until about August i have had more than my fair share of what is being considered trash. And i was completely unaware of this until then. I met some very knowledgable people here on MFK who educated me on quality vs trash. These people is who i bought my festae from and are the only sources, aside from ecuador itself, where i'll ever buy from again!!! I would really like to have them chime in as well on their own accord, as well as everyone else here on MFK. I am not the most experienced when it comes to DNA and being able to describe exactly, but what i have learned is what to look for (ex: High profile, solid bars, strong mouths, colors, strong genetics, and quality bloodlines (unrelated).

As far as the unrelated thing goes.. F1, F0- as long as the F1 were from two unrelated pairs then they themselves are just as clean and good as any wild caught fish. which is great to market cause that is pretty much as good as it gets. Now F1's can be bred to siblings with no problems and still have the potential to produce better looking fish than the parents themselves. but beyond that i wouldnt personally continue breeding siblings especially to sell. Because now the genes are getting washed down. I would like to use an example of breeding champion bloodlines with dogs to help some people understand what im trying to get at with festae. so basically if you breed quality fish together it = quality fry. if you breed one quality fish to trash it = trash!!

There is also great debate on this forum of someone selling wild festae and whether they're actually wild or not?? well who am i to say one way or the other because i have no proof. even thou it does make me skeptical having such a continous source of these f0 festae??? Anyway i have seen and heard alot of these festae being spread into the hobby but where are they now?? and how big are they?? i have only seen a slight few even make it into adulthood and less than half of that actually spawn. I mean there has to have been hundreds sold and only a handful to show?? now is that trash or is that a result of how they are cared for??

There are plenty of people out here with quality festae but may not be as active on public forums as the rest of us. But there are more people with low quality festae and are breeding and spreading them around. The last thing i am trying to do is say that i am the only one with quality festae because that is obviously not true!! My goal here is to get information from the experts to help inform the uninformed as to whats out there and how to tell the difference. Like i stated earlier, the only festae i will ever buy again are from my connections and Ecuador itself. Because IMO the Festae from Ecuador are the best hands down!! there are some nice Peruvians out there and i sold a very nice pair, but its just not what im looking for.
 
First of all define trash and define quality. Are these arbitrary characteristics that you're choosing based off of your personal aesthetic preference? If so, every single person on the board will have a differing personal definition of "trash" and "quality" and there is no conclusion to be made besides keep fish that you personally enjoy.
 
First of all define trash and define quality. Are these arbitrary characteristics that you're choosing based off of your personal aesthetic preference? If so, every single person on the board will have a differing personal definition of "trash" and "quality" and there is no conclusion to be made besides keep fish that you personally enjoy.


Good point. I am not trying to come to an ultimate conclusion more so bring awareness that there is a difference in quality with festae just like any other cichlids. These are not characteristics based off personal aesthetic preference. and overall yes, people will and should keep whatever fish makes them happy. I am not trying to tell anyone in particular that the festae they have is trash. but to bring awareness to people who have been in or just started the hobby that just because your fish has tons of color doesnt make it a quality fish!! To someone inexperienced including myself when i first started just saw the color and was amazed and went out searching for festae. then came across mayans lol IMO its very similiar to Midas and Midevils. to someone who takes pride and joy in buying and raising pure and healthy strains do take offense to people ranting and raving about some LFS midas that they bought when in fact it is a midevil. I know your midas came from a Jeff Rapps strain and you chose that over the unknown of some lfs midas. that i what im getting at. i know a few hobbiests who do take pride in collecting and breeding festae. When they see these festae getting passed around that should have been culled, does tend to get to them. what would you rather have?

Trash- are festae with mouths that slope downward, over developed hump on their back, lack of bars, long sloping faces. and thats just a few that come to mind not to mention any birth defects or deformities.

Quality- are festae with strong mouths which are for eating snails, shrimp etc, high body profile with mass not sunken stomachs, stong solid bars, Nice head profiles, in turn spawn quality fry, not this stuff that dies off before 3"
 
so are festae more prone to these deformities closer to wild caught provenance than other species? sounds like they have some weak genetics naturally if they have be so selectively bred.

Good question, but imo the answer is no. I believe the closer to the wild, the better the genetics. I have yet to see any proven wild Ecuador Festae that look like ****. Unfortunately i cannot say the same for the Peruvian strain. Im sure that some of the Peruvian are actually wild, like a small handfull. as for the rest of the Peruvian I believe are not wild caught and are in fact farm bred!! But of coarse i cannot prove these accusations. But from all the proven wild caught festae that have been brought in over the years, have very strong mouths, which to me proves that they are in fact wild or very close. Alot of these other festae that are being claimed to be wild tend to have downward sloping mouths or mouths that droop, which tells me they are grazers which are pond raised. wild fish have to hunt for their food. pond raised graze of the bottom which imo takes away fro the strong muzzle. and in order for them to have the droopy mouths, its gotta evolved or something which if true would prove that they arent wild.
I didnt mention anything about being selectively bred. I do know that some are being bred like that to pull out certain characteristics that those breeders like.

could you show some pictures of these traits, I'm more of a visual learner.

Ill have to look and see if i can find any pics of the ones i used to have that had poor traits. those fish i usualy didnt take pics of because they didnt look good at all. but i did have some that did look good with the downward mouths that until now i had no clue about. Im not very fancy on a computer to be able to cut and paste and circle characteristics to point them out. Remember this thread isnt about bashing individuals personally or trying to post a pic of someone elses fish to describe the flaws. I know there will be some pics posted here eventually to point out pros and cons.
 
Alot of these other festae that are being claimed to be wild tend to have downward sloping mouths or mouths that droop, which tells me they are grazers which are pond raised. wild fish have to hunt for their food. pond raised graze of the bottom which imo takes away fro the strong muzzle. and in order for them to have the droopy mouths, its gotta evolved or something which if true would prove that they arent wild.

Hi Jason, I would have to disagree with your comment above, as I have seen festae with this trait (downward sloping mouths) that were F1's. A percentage of their fry also carried this trait, which to me equates to a deformity, not a physcial trait that has evolved within a single generation from living in a pond.

In other words, fishman may very well be correct.
 
so are festae more prone to these deformities closer to wild caught provenance than other species? sounds like they have some weak genetics naturally if they have be so selectively bred.

Hi Jason, I would have to disagree with your comment above, as I have seen festae with this trait (downward sloping mouths) that were F1's. A percentage of their fry also carried this trait, which to me equates to a deformity, not a physcial trait that has evolved within a single generation from living in a pond.

In other words, fishman may very well be correct.

Yes that may very well be so. We cant rule out deformities from the wild that go unnoticed and then passed on to future generations in the hobby. so yes that is a very good point and i misunderstood what he said. but on another note what i was saying was that these f0 or f1's with sloping mouths were improperly labled by sellers to make sales. Which i have seen on a few occasions. That doesnt mean that this is true in this case or all cases.
 
what i meant when i said closer to wild meaning a fish as close as f2 or f3 could posess the deformities in festae vs other cichlids which can be bred for generations without major problems in terms of deformities. mel o meras dovii comes to mind. i believe his male originates from his first male from the 70s and is breeding with one of his offspring and is still producing unbelievable young doviis without any deformities which would suggest a much stronger gene pool to me.
 
What do you mean by improperly labelled?

The fish being sold may look as right as rain, but if the genetics for some of these traits are carried by the fish that eventually are later bred, some of those traits can & usually will show up in at least some of their offspring. There's no telling what quality of offspring two fish will throw, until you breed them and find out. With most species of cichlids these type of genetic deformaties are not something that one generally sees in F1 and/or F2 specimens, even when bred to siblings.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com