true... fluval g series isnt so special. like a said the eheim pro3e is almost similar, an fx5 would be a good choice tooBderick67;3541084; said:Ya, go for it. Then you can tell us all what a waste of money it is.
cichlid2006;3542242; said:fluval has a response to all the G series critics http://www.practicalfishkeeping.co.uk/pfk/pages/item.php?news=2274
what a good read. Some nutballs at Hagen 
WHERE ARE YOU MEMBER! There was someone that argued with me about the "Pumps" output being the most important verses the filter output. I was saying the filter output is more important strictly due to the fact that the pumps output is OFF the canister with ZERO restrictions. NOW I HAVE PROOF! Thanks Hagen!Hagen said:First of all, people must understand the difference between flow rates and filter circulation. In all reality the motor performance is "useless" information for aquarium keeping as it's a motor only performance value with no hosing, in-tank accessories or filter media and who will ever use the motor-pump that way?
The useful information is knowing how much water the filter processes but most manufacturers only mention the actual pump or motor performance (flow rate) on their packaging, without pointing out that this is not the same as the actual circulation rates once all the filter media is added and the pump must perform under full load.
what a good read. Some nutballs at Hagen