Below using float glass and a 3.8 safety factor and assuming proper support at the edge of the glass....
Comparing a 366cm x 61cm glass to a 91.5cm x 61cm glass you'll go from needing .408cm to .342cm thick glass. (This is going 12x2 feet to 4 3x2 feet panes.) So it's thinner, but not by a lot.
Comparing a 366cm x 91.5cm glass to a 91.5cm x 91.5cm glass you'll go from needing .749cm to .493cm thick glass. (This is going 12x3 feet to 4 3x3 feet panes.) So, it's a bigger difference.
Basically, it appears that for glass that is not too high, there isn't a lot of incentive to creates panes. Deeper tanks will exhibit more benefit.
If I recall, Arapaimag used 5 foot x 3 foot panes in his 50,000 tank to take advantage of this fact. (If this is wrong, I stand corrected, but I'm almost certain.)
As David R noted, it's the pressure from the tank water level to the bottom of the glass that determines thickness. If the tank is 6 feet high, with water going up to the 5.5 foot mark and the glass stopping at the 3.5 foot mark (with plywood, concrete, etc forming a wall below) then the pressure is still 2 feet (5.5-3.5).