Golden Head Crossback Arowana (7 - 8 inches)

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
well, again... where's the golden head you labeled in your post? And I thought you said you sold your previous batch away? But I see the same fish in your latest pictures. Same defect of a shark mouth and the same scale formation on the same spot....

I don't know about what you are thinking but so far I don't see any aro from your own breeding but pictures from internet been used in your blog title and stuffs.... If you are serious about your arowana business venture, I hope you really deliver what you claim in your every single post you made here.... I hope you don't take the good people here for a joy ride...

From your earlier posting
8f57dc10.jpg


From your updated post
ac0d19a4.jpg
 
yah they look like they might be a real nice rtg but definetly not a crossback and good eye spotting the likeness of the fish koji
totally busted
i like your fish but if you are selling you need to put the correct lable on them especially when dealing with such an expensive fish and trying to sell on here with so many keen eyes...
sorry man i tell it like it is
 
goestonemoa;4593258; said:
yah they look like they might be a real nice rtg but definetly not a crossback and good eye spotting the likeness of the fish koji
totally busted
i like your fish but if you are selling you need to put the correct lable on them especially when dealing with such an expensive fish and trying to sell on here with som many keen eyes...
sorry man i tell it like it is
Click to expand...
dude, it's a crossback not a RTG for sure. But they ain't golden head as labeled by the threadstarter....:(
 
superleggera123;4593272; said:
They are crossbacks for sure
just not high quality
Click to expand...
The fish is of not a bad quality. Just that it's not a golden head crossback why label them as one?:confused:
 
Koji;4593321; said:
The fish is of not a bad quality. Just that it's not a golden head crossback why label them as one?:confused:
Click to expand...

I think Mr. Nagamasone may be very new to the internet, the other possibility is less pleasant. One things for sure, the more gold on an aro the better!
 
Oscarum monstruoso;4593328; said:
I think Mr. Nagamasone may be very new to the internet, the other possibility is less pleasant. One things for sure, the more gold on an aro the better!
Click to expand...
Sorry but I may have to disagree on the part where he's new to internet. Even if one is new to internet, he can type and can start thread and post. That mean he's is capable of giving information. But to provide wrong information got nothing to do with new to internet...:(

If he were to label those crossback as quality crossback, it's acceptable. But to label something which is not and keep repeating this over and over again. Not to mention that he claim to have sold them away from previous thread and now showing the same batch again here. To me it's lying and been dishonest is a big no no in business. Of course, I'm in no position to tell him how to run his business but to me it's just wrong....
 
Thanks everyone for the comments and suggestion.

As Koji pointed out some of the defect of the Aros, we like to express our gratitude to Koji as he educate people on the Aros. As mention earlier, the Aros haven't really developed much yet. As said earlier in other thread, development of the Aros varies. I admit that the aros had few base colors which is golden based, blue based and red based but I dare to say it is Golden Head Crossback Arowana. For sure, I am not lying. Probably, the quality for the Aros varies by individuals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom