Peter McFarlane;1912089; said:ah cepon thanks man!
reason i ask is a guy local to me has one for sale listed as a "Gyana rhom". I've wanted a rhom for ages but when I started trying to do soem research I found very little under that name. But saw it linked to Serrasalmus rhom.
Wanted to check I was researching the right fish
So is this a good rhom to keep? I'm in no rush I can bide my time and wait for a different species if need be.
But as this fish is local it seems like a good deal.
PiranhaBoss.dk;1914659; said:According to the latest released research results, S. rhombeus now appears as restricted to Guyana, so Guyana Rhom IS S. rhombeus.
Morphologically similar specimens from other localities are no longer regarded to be S. rhombeus-complex species. Instead they are historical-, or new-, species of the rhombeus-group (which, by the way, also include small species like S. sanchezi)
So please fasten your seat-belts. Piranha-taxonomy is about to turn upside-down once again!![]()
PiranhaBoss.dk;1914659; said:According to the latest released research results, S. rhombeus now appears as restricted to Guyana, so Guyana Rhom IS S. rhombeus.
Morphologically similar specimens from other localities are no longer regarded to be S. rhombeus-complex species. Instead they are historical-, or new-, species of the rhombeus-group (which, by the way, also include small species like S. sanchezi)
So please fasten your seat-belts. Piranha-taxonomy is about to turn upside-down once again!![]()
RonTheRHOM;1914776; said:but sanchezi isnt a rhom anyway, its a sanchezi, it shares the serrasalmus genus but that is it.
are u sure you know what ur talkin about?
post a link to this 'info'