has anyone else noticed...

[A. gigas]

on kingsnake.com that gila monsters and beaded lizards are listed under "venomous", which is listed under "snakes"?

 

[EricIvins]

Where else are they going to go? They are Venomous, so they fit under the "Venomous" category?.........

 

[coura]

......

 

[A. gigas]

Where else are they going to go? They are Venomous, so they fit under the "Venomous" category?.........

well, the venomous category is under "snakes"
so i'm just wondering why isn't there a venomous category under "lizards"?

 

[TTTT]

Because there are only 2 (debatable) venomous species of lizards, they aren't going to create a whole new section just for them.

 

[A. gigas]

Because there are only 2 (debatable) venomous species of lizards, they aren't going to create a whole new section just for them.

i guess...

i'm a perfectionist, so it kinda bothers me a little...

 

[coura]

i guess...

i'm a perfectionist, so it kinda bothers me a little...

You dont have much to do, do you?

 

[Lepisosteus platyrhincus]

he is like 13 so no

 

[rudukai13]

That's the problem. With snakes, there's really not much debate as to what can be defined as "venomous" or not - even with rear-fanged snakes, it's fairly cut and dry. With lizards though, there's a lot more gray area, and it'd be far too complicated to sort through what was where if there was a venomous category for lizards.

 

[A. gigas]

he is like 13 so yes

fix'd