In my mind if what these researchers/students, etc feel was true, and this pathogen is always present, I would think that conditions for an outbreak would often be present in the vast majority of private aquariums, and we would be seeing far greater numbers of columnaris than what we currently are. Far greater.
I have owned many tropical species, including several flowerhorns, yet never once experienced this disease in any of my tanks, over many years of keeping fish. I've also had periods where stress is at a high enough level in some of my fish that it should have presented an opportunity for this pathogen to take hold. I suspect that the same could be said by millions of other hobbyists world-wide. Have we all just been lucky? I doubt it.
Yes, many fish do come from Florida, and Asia, but not all of them. The vast majority of my fish have come from friends, or local breeders - and the bulk of their fish have come from facilities that don't stock fish from Asian ponds. But even if one considered ponds in Florida & Asia, and all the millions of tanks at LFS, and all the millions of highly stressed fish that end up in those tanks, from ponds in Florida and Asia, in conditions that are perfect for this pathogenic bacteria to flourish, columnaris is not a commonly seen disease. Not even remotely close to being as common as say ich. Anyone that has worked or spent some serious time in LFS's over the years will understand - it's not nearly as common as one would expect it to be, if what these researchers say is true. There's a lot that is still unknown about this pathogen, and its various strains.
In the previous thread, Duane, you felt that if this pathogen was present in a fish, that with a proper qt period this pathogen would surface due to the stress by netting/transporting/relocating a fish. And I completely agree.
If I think back over the years, for every case of columnaris reported on MFK, there have probably been a 100+ cases of hexamita/spiro. Maybe more, maybe as high as 1,000+ but the ratio isn't even close. Ditto to Ichthyophthirius. If as these researchers claim columnaris is everywere, then it should be surfacing everywhere, all of the time, over & over again. That, or the majority of fish in the hobby have built up a natural immunity from constant exposure, because I am certainly not seeing this pathogen at the numbers that one would expect. Not in real life, not on MFK, not anywhere.
I have owned many tropical species, including several flowerhorns, yet never once experienced this disease in any of my tanks, over many years of keeping fish. I've also had periods where stress is at a high enough level in some of my fish that it should have presented an opportunity for this pathogen to take hold. I suspect that the same could be said by millions of other hobbyists world-wide. Have we all just been lucky? I doubt it.
Yes, many fish do come from Florida, and Asia, but not all of them. The vast majority of my fish have come from friends, or local breeders - and the bulk of their fish have come from facilities that don't stock fish from Asian ponds. But even if one considered ponds in Florida & Asia, and all the millions of tanks at LFS, and all the millions of highly stressed fish that end up in those tanks, from ponds in Florida and Asia, in conditions that are perfect for this pathogenic bacteria to flourish, columnaris is not a commonly seen disease. Not even remotely close to being as common as say ich. Anyone that has worked or spent some serious time in LFS's over the years will understand - it's not nearly as common as one would expect it to be, if what these researchers say is true. There's a lot that is still unknown about this pathogen, and its various strains.
In the previous thread, Duane, you felt that if this pathogen was present in a fish, that with a proper qt period this pathogen would surface due to the stress by netting/transporting/relocating a fish. And I completely agree.
If I think back over the years, for every case of columnaris reported on MFK, there have probably been a 100+ cases of hexamita/spiro. Maybe more, maybe as high as 1,000+ but the ratio isn't even close. Ditto to Ichthyophthirius. If as these researchers claim columnaris is everywere, then it should be surfacing everywhere, all of the time, over & over again. That, or the majority of fish in the hobby have built up a natural immunity from constant exposure, because I am certainly not seeing this pathogen at the numbers that one would expect. Not in real life, not on MFK, not anywhere.