Inbred Jack Dempseys?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

thesquishy

Candiru
MFK Member
Feb 21, 2009
285
1
46
in a world of my own...
So I have a pair of Jacks that had babies about 10-11 months ago, anyways two of their babies have laid eggs now; so pretty much brother and sister we getting their mack on. Will they turn out alright or am I in for some mutated retarted babies??? Just wondering if I should destroy the eggs or not.


mommy....
DSCN1739.jpg


Daddy.....
DSCN1747.jpg
 
Not necessarily... It is possible... But not always the case.. Good genes go on.. But somewhere down the line problems start you will notice.
 
it would probs make weaker more suceptable to disease fish if it were me id destroy them
 
Tongue33;2954893; said:
Not necessarily... It is possible... But not always the case.. Good genes go on.. But somewhere down the line problems start you will notice.

It might be better to destroy the eggs but what kind of problems may be down the line if they are not destroyed? Stunted growth, disease, a couple extra fins????
 
IN the short run there's no real damage. In some water sheds in the wild there might be only a handful of successfully breeding fish. In short..it happens.

If you consider that a lot of fish breeders manage to maintain the majority of a batch of fry for future sale you could argue that the "survival of the fittest" is thrown right out the window since ALL of the fry...regardless of their genetic make up...make it to a large size and are sold to the public. Wild population of spawning fish will actually continue having fry even as the last brood continues to grow. In the wild, the larger fry snack on the smaller (new brood) and life goes on as THEY get bigger and snack on the next. That's the way mom nature makes sure only the strongest survive.

Not to belabor the point, but there are populations of cichlid species in aquariums today that are "overall" genetically inferior after YEARS of breeding through the same bloodline. Umbriferum come to mind. Years back there was a supply of "wild " stock that made it into the hobby that kept the species going strong. I think the fish that most have in their tank now are...not as "healthy". I've seen many that survive to a particular size...then get ill and die. May be years...but it happens. THe largest I had ever seen was a friend who had a 21" specimen in his tank (now dead). I spoke with an old timer this past weekend who had one twenty years ago...30+ inches and lived for many years. Just my 2 Cents.

Sorry for the info overload. Enjoy breeding your Jacks. Watching it happen is one of the best things that happens with this hobby.


Mo
 
great info buddy,and def not too much info overload it was very informative... so most likley they should turn out normal then? atleast for pet store standards then????
 
people line breed their fish all the time. take a look over at the hybrid section, you see people talking about it a lot; growing the fry out and breeding them back to one of the parents.
 
imo dont destroy them im sure that lfs fish are inbreed fish seriously they dont care.look at convicts they inbreed all the time no problems
 
Not to mention how stale Jack Dempsey genes are in our captive strains already. Unless you know of any recent wild-caught ancestry, your original pair were probably at best distant cousins and, unless they were pond-raised, probably came from the same parents. But since you appear to be a conscientious breeder, I suspect their origins are no mystery to you. Either way, the weak will probably die off and those that live will be pretty and probably worth owning. Happy fishkeeping and good luck to your hillbilly fish kids! :)
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com