Couple of weeks ago we had a huge post on fish evolution versus fish creation, while I was arguing for the evolution side someone pointed out my flaw when looking at religion.
Dacox and redtailfool pointed out that religious people and the Church do not take the Bible in a literal sense. Bunch of questions arose from that point that I can not find the answers to.
1. Did people take the Bible in a literal at some point in history or was it context and metaphorical interpretation since day 1?
2. In that case where do you draw the line between what they take literal and what is metaphorical? Is Adam and Eve, Noahs arch, Earth existing for only 6000, etc.. real or ?
I keep looking on various websites and various books without much luck, and I am scared to go ask a priest for obvious reasons
Dacox and redtailfool pointed out that religious people and the Church do not take the Bible in a literal sense. Bunch of questions arose from that point that I can not find the answers to.
1. Did people take the Bible in a literal at some point in history or was it context and metaphorical interpretation since day 1?
2. In that case where do you draw the line between what they take literal and what is metaphorical? Is Adam and Eve, Noahs arch, Earth existing for only 6000, etc.. real or ?
I keep looking on various websites and various books without much luck, and I am scared to go ask a priest for obvious reasons
