Honda12;500610; said:I am gonna go with a fuelleborni. Fuelleborni tend to be a more deep bodied and stocky fish vs the trewavasae which is ussually more slender and elongated.
Also being in that both of these fish have a modified mouth that makes the fish sort of look like it has a nose, a fuelleborni has more of a smushed one. Where as the trewavasae has more a of pointed nose.
So given the looks of your fish, I would have to go with a fuelleborni.
Honda12;500610; said:I am gonna go with a fuelleborni. Fuelleborni tend to be a more deep bodied and stocky fish vs the trewavasae which is ussually more slender and elongated.
Also being in that both of these fish have a modified mouth that makes the fish sort of look like it has a nose, a fuelleborni has more of a smushed one. Where as the trewavasae has more a of pointed nose.
So given the looks of your fish, I would have to go with a fuelleborni.
fish head )'>;507154; said:Here's one of my fuelleborni.
straitjacketstar;511280; said:Well, with only 2 Labeotropheus species, the fact that some trewavasae could be confused for fuelleborni or that some fuelleborni could pass for trewavasae - the possibility of a fuelleborni x trewavasae doesn't usually pass one's mind when trying to ID their Labeo. People ask "trewavasae" or "fuelleborni" never a "possible trewavasae x fuelleborni" which I tend to believe is more common than some folks think.
Similar to the red devil/midas issue and while possibly not to the extent of the RD/midas it's on the same page.
I personally wouldn't put a definite secies name to that fish in particular however I would love having it either way since a Labeotropheus is a Labeotropheus and any Labeotropheus is worth their keep.![]()