is this enough surface agitation?

[aidenboyjon]

I decided to move the bubblers to the back so that they arent right in front of thr tank but I'd like to know if this will be enough agitation on its own.
64g
4 juevinile bgk
the filter is an external box and am using that disperse hose slightly submerged to give the surface a small ripple motion on the surface. It covers about 3/4ths of the back and pushes the small ripples towards the front. The bubblers are in the back behind the disperser because from what I understand it can use the bubbles to remove carbon dioxide. Will this be adequate enough agitation, or should I have kept the bubblers at the front corners of the tank?

 

[FJB]

Enough for what?
What do you want to accomplish?
There is quite a bit of surface agitation seen in the picture, allowing plenty of gas exchange, which is a good thing.

 

[aidenboyjon]

Basically my concern is that my lil boys are getting enough oxygen. Since I just moved the bubblers away from the front into a more controlled back area and out of direct sight, I wanna just get some backup thoughts on whether or not it seems as if there is plenty of agitation for gas exchange. Basically should I have kept the bubblers in the front or does this look good or better than enough?

 

[aidenboyjon]

Basically my concern is that my lil boys are getting enough oxygen. Since I just moved the bubblers away from the front into a more controlled back area and out of direct sight, I wanna just get some backup thoughts on whether or not it seems as if there is plenty of agitation for gas exchange. Basically should I have kept the bubblers in the front or does this look good or better than enough?

 

[Hybridfish7]

Yes they are