Rockbass6;1386375; said:Guppy I guess you don't understand where I'm coming from. Our state record bluegill is 2 1/2 pounds that is the biggest EVER caught in the history of my state so I am NOT way off base... For you telling me to stop fish keeping for keeping a little bluegill in a 20 gal is really uncalled for. I would LOVE to see the day our bluegill reach the size of a legal size smallmouth!! More people would fish for them if they did, but they dont. So people around here fish for steelhead instead.
Ban me or whatever but you know Im right.
That's what people don't get. I'm not arguing with you or attacking you. A lot of people make this mistake. "Oh, the fish from this pond only get this size". That's just not the case. Fish only get "stunted" or don't reach full size for a reason, not because it's in their genes. If you take a "stunted" bluegill from a farm pond with a population too large to support larger bluegill, and put it in a controlled environment, again, with proper feeding and water quality, it WILL reach the max size for the species, about 16". It may take a while, but they will get there. Just because a bluegill hasn't been caught in your state at that size, that doesn't mean they don't exist, and doesn't mean they won't reach that size in an aquarium. Our concern here is for the fish, and if you decide to take it offensively, then so be it. I'm not trying to offend or attack you.
I'm sorry if I seem to be "taking" your thread, flower1982. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. If you want to use your 20H, smaller Enneacanthus sunfish would be your best bet. Bantam sunfish are another great choice for a tank of that size. Bantams are a little aggressive, so your best bet would be to put quite a few of them in there, to help spread the aggression between several fish, instead of just one.