I'm currently enrolled in a summer school Critical Thinking & Composition source and I have two days to write a whole refutation essay. My position is that all invasive species are bad and I am refuting an essay by Alan Burdick who says that not all invasive species are bad. I understand that maybe not "ALL" invasive species are bad, but I need some help forming an argument that "MOST" are harmful to the environment and ourselves. Burdick makes 3 main claims that I am going to try and refute: (1) that the environment can simply make room in its ecosystem for extra non-native species; (2) that biodiversity increases as invasive species are introduced; and (3) that invasive species don't make ecosystems shrink or disappear.
My counter arguments are these: (1) give specific examples of invasive species that have caused major ecosystem damage such as snakeheads, asian carps, caurpela taxifolia the seaweed, etc.; (2) find scientific articles with numerical evidence that biodiversity is in fact harmed - there's a few sources I found on ebscohost -; and (3) find examples such as the lake crofton in maryland.
I need some help though, this is the first refutation essay I've ever written and if anyone can give good advice, that'd be much appreciated.
Here's the link to the article: http://www.aburdick.com/features_and_essays/the_truth_about_invasive_speci.html
My counter arguments are these: (1) give specific examples of invasive species that have caused major ecosystem damage such as snakeheads, asian carps, caurpela taxifolia the seaweed, etc.; (2) find scientific articles with numerical evidence that biodiversity is in fact harmed - there's a few sources I found on ebscohost -; and (3) find examples such as the lake crofton in maryland.
I need some help though, this is the first refutation essay I've ever written and if anyone can give good advice, that'd be much appreciated.
Here's the link to the article: http://www.aburdick.com/features_and_essays/the_truth_about_invasive_speci.html