When a model is excessively complex, it has a poor ability to accurately predict invasion risk, should be read as "we are keeping the data as vague as possible to get the results we want"
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2696
This is such a joke. There was also no mention of the data collected during the studies in Gainesville, FL and (Adel?) South Carolina studies where the snakes were released and monitored and found dead over just a few months.
The USGS just needs to admit that they are horribly wrong this time. There have been dozens of studies done to debunk their pseudo-science and yet all of them have been ignored.
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2696
This is such a joke. There was also no mention of the data collected during the studies in Gainesville, FL and (Adel?) South Carolina studies where the snakes were released and monitored and found dead over just a few months.
The USGS just needs to admit that they are horribly wrong this time. There have been dozens of studies done to debunk their pseudo-science and yet all of them have been ignored.
