New Species of Ant Discovered (Ant from Mars)

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

Mystus Redtail

Fire Eel
MFK Member
Jun 8, 2007
2,154
3
68
Fishing in Wisconsin
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,423117,00.html
Strange 'Ant From Mars' Discovered in Amazon Rainforest

Tuesday, September 16, 2008
By Andrea Thompson


Martialis heureka, or 'ant from Mars,' discovered deep in the Amazon rainforest.

A newly discovered species of a blind, subterranean predator — dubbed the "Ant from Mars" — is likely a descendant of one of the very first ants to evolve on Earth, a new study finds.
Christian Rabeling, an evolutionary biology graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin, found the only known specimen of the new ant species in dead plant material on the ground in the Amazon rainforest at the Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria in Manaus, Brazil, in 2003.
Rabeling and his colleagues named the ant Martialis heureka ("ant from Mars") because they'd never seen an ant like it before.


The ant is well-adapted for its underground home, with a long, pale body and no eyes. It also has long, slender forceps-like mandibles that researchers suspect the ant uses to capture prey.
M. heureka not only constitutes a new species, but a new genus and subfamily of ants as well. The new subfamily, one of 21 ant subfamilies, is the first new one to be named by scientists since 1967.


Rabeling says the discovery, detailed in the Sept. 15 issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, will help biologists better understand the biodiversity and evolution of ants.
Ants evolved more than 120 million years ago from wasp ancestors. Scientists think that ants evolved quickly into many different lineages, specializing to live in the soil, leaf-litter or trees, or in multiple habitats.
DNA taken from the M. heureka specimen's leg indicates that it belongs at the base of the ant evolutionary tree.
"This discovery lends support to the idea that blind, subterranean predator ants arose at the dawn of ant evolution," Rabeling said.
This doesn't mean that the ancestor to all ants was blind and lived underground, but that these features evolved early in ant history and persisted in the environmentally stable soils of the tropics.
The finding of M. heureka "hints at a wealth of species, possibly of great evolutionary importance, still hidden in the soils of the remaining rainforests," the authors of the study wrote.
 
Less complicated DNA... no eyes... long slender [frail] body... sounds like a real foundation for the evolution of a species. Maybe this will be the first time evolution has been proven. I bet it was a defective ant in a colony and got removed by other ants.
 
NilePufferFanatic;2206644; said:
Less complicated DNA... no eyes... long slender [frail] body... sounds like a real foundation for the evolution of a species. Maybe this will be the first time evolution has been proven. I bet it was a defective ant in a colony and got removed by other ants.

Ha. Re-read it. It's a descendant of the first ants. It's not the foundation, it's a product of evolution, just like everything else.

Evolution cannot be proven, just like gravity cannot be proven. (They're both theories, but have enough circumstantial evidence to be considered fact.)

But this isn't a debate on evolution, it's a new ant species. Very cool.
 
very cool! i'd like to see a whole colony of those and how they work!

and like MM said, in real science, nothing is ever proven.
 
amazing stuff... always interested in new species and new discovery... in general...
 
Modest_Man;2206673; said:
Ha. Re-read it. It's a descendant of the first ants. It's not the foundation, it's a product of evolution, just like everything else.

Evolution cannot be proven, just like gravity cannot be proven. (They're both theories, but have enough circumstantial evidence to be considered fact.)

But this isn't a debate on evolution, it's a new ant species. Very cool.
it isnt a theory its a hypothesis. there is no proven evidence whatsoever.
 
Modest_Man;2206673; said:
Ha. Re-read it. It's a descendant of the first ants. It's not the foundation, it's a product of evolution, just like everything else.

Evolution cannot be proven, just like gravity cannot be proven. (They're both theories, but have enough circumstantial evidence to be considered fact.)

But this isn't a debate on evolution, it's a new ant species. Very cool.

Passionate 4 pikes;2206801; said:
it isnt a theory its a hypothesis. there is no proven evidence whatsoever.

Here is a quote from Darwin on the Subject:
"When we descend to details we can prove that no one species has changed (i.e., we cannot prove that a single species has changed): nor can we prove that the supposed changes are beneficial, which is the groundwork of the theory. Nor can we explain why some species have changed and others have not. The latter case seems to me hardly more difficult to understand precisely and in detail than the former case of supposed change" - Darwin, 1863.
 
NilePufferFanatic;2206644; said:
Less complicated DNA... no eyes... long slender [frail] body... sounds like a real foundation for the evolution of a species. Maybe this will be the first time evolution has been proven. I bet it was a defective ant in a colony and got removed by other ants.

Defective?

The ant is well-adapted for its underground home, with a long, pale body and no eyes. It also has long, slender forceps-like mandibles that researchers suspect the ant uses to capture prey.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com