David,
DavidW;528290; said:
what a bunch of bogus reasoning
This is strictly a burocratic and political decision.
ray experts , scientists studying them and their populations, in Manaus , from the University there, have argued in favor of ray quotas being larger than before.
the price of one live ray might buy a cow which would feed a lot more people for a lot longer than one ray.
there is not much meat on a ray.
ray populations have been shown in census studies to be increasing due to predators being removed.
Rays capacity for successful reproduction is high due to the fact that they give live birth there is no need for them to produce hundreds of eggs on the off chance that one or 2 will hatch and survive.
Live birth is an extremely successful reproduction strategy.
Use of rays as a food fish ( for the Japanese who will pay huge fees to gov agents) has grown in recent years.
Rays are still allowed to be killed as a 'pest'
Basically, this IS a burocratic and political decision, yes, based on the low number of agents of IBAMA and on the fact that the harvesting of rays to the ornamental fish trade being NOT AN ESSENTIAL ACTIVITY.
Do you REALLY think that local fishermen get paid as much as YOU pay for a ray in a LFS? There's no way a fisherman can buy a cow by the price of a live ray here... Maybe 2-3 Kg of bovine meat, but not a cow. The first-hand distributors here sell a juvie motoro for about US$ 15.00-20.00, meaning that they pay US$ 10.00 each, at most, for the fishermen. Most probably around US$ 5.00, to be honest. If you know where I can buy a cow with this money, PLEASE tell me.
I agree about the ray quotas, or I'd agree IF the sellers/ distributors/ exporters were RELIABLE about their given informations and the reality. If they declared EXACTLY the same they sold/ exported, it would work nicely, but it's NOT the case. And IBAMA have too many agents to keep track of the non-declared specimens. That's why the big bosses devided that the prohibition is much more practical than the regulamentation/ restriction. Mainly because IBAMA can't trust the seller's declarations.
T1KARMANN;528276; said:
the food trade wont take pups to eat as they are to small the the fish trade does normally take only pups
no more pups no more adults makes sence to me
Well, according to the "fisheries department" (actually several government entities) of Brazil, rays are food fishes, and there's a permanent pressure on the adults. The ornamental fish trade focuses on the young specimens... That's called "double pressure" here. Harvesting both the young and the adults. It's considered too heavy for the rays by the authorities.
DavidW;529671; said:
apparantly this is not quite accurate.
The law applies only to the state of Amazonia, which means Manaus.
Belem is the other main center for fish exports and is in the state of Para, and will decide in a few months...but lot of the exporters are not renewing ray permits anyway as a kind of protest against gov. interference and exorbitant fees for them, coupled with rays being problematic anyway
Actually, you're wrong here. That's a NATIONAL regulamentation. It's valid in Brazil as a whole. Most exporters are complaining now, because there's a lot of pressure from the BUYERS to have rays within every big order, but at least for a while, NO RAYS FROM THE WILD.
Unfortunately, there are NO captive breeding projects/ facilities for rays in Brazil, because these specimens could be exported. Why there are no breeders? Simply because there are too many collectors harvesting the wild population, and it's easier and cheaper to deal with WC specimens than to breed their own. Period. Just the same problem with SA arowanas.
Best regards.
Daniel.