Origins of domestic scalare

mabirchell

Jack Dempsey
MFK Member
Oct 22, 2012
202
7
33
38
East Texas
Hi guys, just curious if anyone knows the original collection point of the domestic scalare. Are they just a mix of everywhere by now? I see a lot of wild collection have very distinct markings, where the common “silver” scalare is just plan silver with stripes. I have a wild Peruvian scalare with my domestic scalare and the difference is very noticeable. Is the red eyes a bred in trait or is there a wild type with red eyes? Any info would be great ?.
 

neutrino

Goliath Tigerfish
MFK Member
Jan 22, 2013
2,400
2,638
179
Mid-Atlantic, US
The consensus of literature I've seen, which often seems to be quoting the same uncredited original source, is that domestic angelfish are the result of various crosses of undocumented collection points by early collectors and breeders, and possibly includes crosses of species they didn't distinguish between, so that domestic angels being called "scalare" may be partly due to the ignorance of early collectors regarding separate species of Pterophyllum. In any case, domestic scalare have a murky past and the best way to get a true 'wild type' scalare descendant, or scalare descended from a specific population, is from a breeder who started with wild fish from a known location.

It's also been suggested by some that Pterophyllum species may (or may have) hybridize(d) in the wild, also that scalare may yet be divided into more than one species.
 
Last edited:

duanes

MFK Moderators
Staff member
Moderator
MFK Member
Jun 7, 2007
21,025
26,354
2,910
Isla Taboga Panama via Milwaukee
I had my first"angel fish" in the late 1950s, and at least in the stores I went to as a kid, they were just "angelfish", no distinction, or acknowledgement there were separate species, although even back then, the line bred blacks, and veil tailed were available.
I wonder if even the collectors knew at that point?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mabirchell

mabirchell

Jack Dempsey
MFK Member
Oct 22, 2012
202
7
33
38
East Texas
I had my first"angel fish" in the late 1950s, and at least in the stores I went to as a kid, they were just "angelfish", no distinction, or acknowledgement there were separate species, although even back then, the line bred blacks, and veil tailed were available.
I wonder if even the collectors knew at that point?
Probably not. Seems they still have trouble with them. This happened to a lot of African cichlids when they first came out of the lakes. They got jumbled into tanks and crossbred from ignorance of the species until more was known.
 

mabirchell

Jack Dempsey
MFK Member
Oct 22, 2012
202
7
33
38
East Texas
The consensus of literature I've seen, which often seems to be quoting the same uncredited original source, is that domestic angelfish are the result of various crosses of undocumented collection points by early collectors and breeders, and possibly includes crosses of species they didn't distinguish between, so that domestic angels being called "scalare" may be partly due to the ignorance of early collectors regarding separate species of Pterophyllum. In any case, domestic scalare have a murky past and the best way to get a true 'wild type' scalare descendant, or scalare descended from a specific population, is from a breeder who started with wild fish from a known location.

It's also been suggested by some that Pterophyllum species may (or may have) hybridize(d) in the wild, also that scalare may yet be divided into more than one species.
Thanks ?. I am a sucker for the wild type fish. I feel angels communicate better with their stripes. Although some of those blue/silver types and the koi types have caught my eye here lately ?.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neutrino
zoomed.com
hikariusa.com
aqaimports.com
Store