Parent order in listing crosses

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

auratum

Candiru
MFK Member
Feb 12, 2008
230
1
48
Michigan
Guys,

Is there some reason I see everyone listing the Father/Male fish first when stating hybrid crosses? I breed plants and fish and in the plant world, the Mother/Female is always listed first (easy to remember - "Ladies First").

For instance - the hybrid of a Blood Parrot and Carpintis. It seems to be common knowledge that only the females are fertile. So in my experience, it would be written "Blood Parrot x Carpintis" and not "Carpintis x Blood Parrot". The order they are written implies who was mother/father.

I am just curious if there is a different accepted format or standard being used in the fish world or is it just people not knowing the expected order to list them?

I don't mean to be anal retentive, but it is confusing when they are written in random order, and I think there is a standard in use in Science.

Thanks!
Patrick
 
I agree. Some order would be nice but I doubt many would follow it. Just look at how many people ask if they have a midas or red devil in the CA/SA forums when there's a sticky already on it.

Sent from my HTC Glacier using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com