Question and Poll: Fish with humps - like or dislike?

[brown_eye_crushers25]

How many people out there like or dislike fish with humps? When I say humps I mean the fatty deposits on like say Fronts or Flowehorns, etc.

Usually its one or the other I am guessing

Any thoughts?

 

[Dread]

It depends. If they're grotesquely huge like the "show quality" (how do you even determine that anyways?) Flowerhorns, it looks hideous. But when it's natural on a frontosa, it's fine in my book. But when things are selectivly bred for large Nuchal humps, I think it looks bad.

 

[brown_eye_crushers25]

I personally am not a fan of the HUMP. Nothing personal....not my thing.

 

[rallysman]

I like it

 

[cichlid savage]

I never really thought about it before but as long as the hump isnt grossly over sized I think they give some fish character.

 

[davo]

On fish... nah not really, not even on pbass much. Frontosa is really my only exception.
On women...

 

[CTU2fan]

Generally no, but sometimes it looks cool. Depends on the fish. Take pbass...they're kind of sleek looking fish normally, then add a big hump...it doesn't look right. On a front or RD it's cool.

And FH's suck, hump or not

 

[hayden]

i think it looks ugly

 

[fatboy22]

i like humps on fronts, blockheads, women, etc.

 

[Bsixxx]

normal ones I like, like red devils and other cichlids, but those disgusting ones on flower horns where its like a tumor and they look like they cant swim right

ewwww
i hate those