C cpm6t Gambusia MFK Member Nov 8, 2011 577 7 18 Sri Lanka Apr 26, 2016 #1 I need quick help on IDing this cichla. Is it a mono or ocel? This is the only picture I have, I was told it is about 10-12" inch in size.
I need quick help on IDing this cichla. Is it a mono or ocel? This is the only picture I have, I was told it is about 10-12" inch in size.
gangster Arapaima MFK Member Apr 17, 2008 13,456 800 201 mountains Apr 26, 2016 #2 It looks like a mix of the 2 species.
C cpm6t Gambusia MFK Member Nov 8, 2011 577 7 18 Sri Lanka Apr 26, 2016 #3 Hi Gangster, can you please give more details? What are the things you see (that makes it look like a mix)? Thanks in advance.
Hi Gangster, can you please give more details? What are the things you see (that makes it look like a mix)? Thanks in advance.
gangster Arapaima MFK Member Apr 17, 2008 13,456 800 201 mountains Apr 26, 2016 #4 The blotching under the bars arent defined enough to resemble a mono and the head shape is too round imo. And it doesnt look pure occelaris to me. Im not saying that it wont be a nice looking bass as it gets larger. It just doenst look pure to me.
The blotching under the bars arent defined enough to resemble a mono and the head shape is too round imo. And it doesnt look pure occelaris to me. Im not saying that it wont be a nice looking bass as it gets larger. It just doenst look pure to me.
StIcKy~RiCe Redtail Catfish MFK Member May 24, 2005 2,564 738 150 ~ Laos ~ Apr 26, 2016 #5 gangster said: The blotching under the bars arent defined enough to resemble a mono and the head shape is too round imo. And it doesnt look pure occelaris to me. Im not saying that it wont be a nice looking bass as it gets larger. It just doenst look pure to me. Click to expand... +1 im not expert but i do agreed with you one this. Hard to tell.
gangster said: The blotching under the bars arent defined enough to resemble a mono and the head shape is too round imo. And it doesnt look pure occelaris to me. Im not saying that it wont be a nice looking bass as it gets larger. It just doenst look pure to me. Click to expand... +1 im not expert but i do agreed with you one this. Hard to tell.