Random thought: Aerodynamics.

[ewurm]

I was just thinking that a cube has to be the least aerodynamic shape possible. Help me if I am wrong.

 

[Guinness]

I dissagree. I'd hate to jump out of an airplane tied to a cube when there are perfectly good parachutes.

 

[ewurm]

Damn. Actually, after I thought about it, A snow plow has to be less aerodynamic than a cube, because it forces air in front of you. So is a concave surface the least aerodynamic?

 

[RyanS]

Depends on the application in my opinion.

 

[ewurm]

I don't think it does. I think aerodynamics are the same in most applications. A car or plane with a big satellite dish on the hood would be unaerodynamic, but a sleek design is more aerodynamic, whether you are traveling vertically or horizontally.

 

[TankBuster]

I think the answer here is the 1971 Volkswagon Bus.

 

[rayman45]

...you need to get out more

 

[ewurm]

I think the answer here is the 1971 Volkswagon Bus.

As far as vehicles go, that would be one of the worst....Damn hippies preach about saving the planet and drive around in a vehicle that gets 8 miles per gallon...LOL

 

[ewurm]

...you need to get out more

I probably get out more than you, I have a DRIVERS LICENSE.

 

[TankBuster]

As far as vehicles go, that would be one of the worst....Damn hippies preach about saving the planet and drive around in a vehicle that gets 8 miles per gallon...LOL

Speaking of fuel mileage, I have a liscence plate frame on my Super Duty that says "0-60 in 3 gallons".