RED ALERT!!! Prepare to FIGHT!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

Sylvias

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Jul 23, 2010
898
5
0
Somewhere
US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) has filed a final rule with the White House Office of Management & Budget (OMB). This filing has no material changes from the proposed rule that would add 9 constricting snakes to the Injurious Wildlife list of the Lacey Act. This would make import or interstate transport of the 9 constrictors a felony with heavy fines and potential jail time. This is the final stage of the rule making process. OMB's role is to review the proposed rule to ensure that the costs to businesses do not outweigh the purported benefits. In spite of USARK's information to the contrary, and the Small Business Administration's findings that FWS did not do its due diligence in determining economic impact, we remain unsure of OMB's position. As many as a million American citizens could be negatively impacted if this rule is enacted. It would create a whole new class of criminal out of law abiding citizens engaged in what is now a perfectly legal trade.

There is also likely to be an oversight hearing at the US House Natural Resources Committee because of the potential to destroy a viable $1.4 billion cottage industry; and the flagrant disregard by FWS for mandated process and procedure under the Administrative Procedures Act and Information Quality Act. USARK has uncovered evidence that appears to point to an intentional effort to manufacture science to support a policy directive based on staff preference at FWS. This preference by FWS could mean the loss of thousands of jobs and the destruction of viable sector of our nations economy in a time of hardship.

Members of the Reptile Nation should prepare themselves for the “Big Fight”. This process should take about 45 days to unfold. USARK calls upon the OMB, the US House of Representatives and the US Senate to look closely at how FWS has circumvented due process to create policy based on staff preference. USARK believes that these actions by a government agency, upon close examination, will be found to be arbitrary, capricious and unlawful.

USARK needs the Reptile Nation to pull together as never before. This is our chance to overcome unfair regulation. Please stay tuned to USARK alerts and forward this communique to you circle of influence.

Please click the Donate button at the top of the page and help protect your ability to trade reptiles.
 
herps/reptiles are not my thing, and to be honest with you - I'm supporting them on that regulation.


There are too many people out there that shouldn't be owning any of those reptiles or have any business selling/handling them.
 
Then leave this forum dude. You fail. Id elaborate but typing on my phone sucks

No to regulatiobn

Posted on mobile.monsterfishkeepers.com
 
Proteus;5026993; said:
herps/reptiles are not my thing, and to be honest with you - I'm supporting them on that regulation.


There are too many people out there that shouldn't be owning any of those reptiles or have any business selling/handling them.

I agree. Taking over Everglades.
 
Proteus;5026993; said:
herps/reptiles are not my thing, and to be honest with you - I'm supporting them on that regulation.


There are too many people out there that shouldn't be owning any of those reptiles or have any business selling/handling them.

That's just not a well thought out statement or position. There are plenty of people who keep dogs, drive cars, drink irresponsably and they become a public safety hazard. Does that mean we should all give up our civil liberties, because of the few? It's a pretty ridiculous statement supporting a regulation that is basically saying we need to be controlled as a community, because we can't be responsible ourselves. Where does the line get drawn? When are we smart enough to think for ourselves and make our own decisions?
 
They aren't really taking over the everglades. Thats just how the media has spun it. South florida is a mess with invasive species...and not just from released pets. This has been discussed in great detail here already. Cats should be banned too because they have impacted native wildlife far worse. The feral cat population is huge in soflo, not to mention how outdoor housecats all over the world are detrimental to small wildlife.
The irresponsible people will continue to obtain such animals despite regulation, as if regulation will be enforced. This just hurts the responsible keepers.
 
Joeygee23;5027056; said:
I agree. Taking over Everglades.

CubanFury;5027066; said:

More and more dogs each year are being abused and becoming public safety hazards. Maybe we should regulate them too. If anything the government should think about having what "could" be considered a dangerous reptile micro-chipped so irresponsible owners can be held accountable. Not make a broad sweeping regulation that punishes everyone equally. Both the responsible and irresponsible as well as hurt alot of small business.
 
Joeygee23;5027056; said:
I agree. Taking over Everglades.

So, because they're taking over the everglades we should make them illegal in THE ENTIRE US?! How does this make any sense at all?
With that sentiment we should also ban cats... after-all they ARE responsible for the largest decline in wild songbird species.

I think the "gubment" needs to leave something like this up to the individual states to decide & weigh the risk factors and make their OWN legislation.

in NH we just battled a very similar issue over Quaker Parakeets... Because they are invasive and cause problems in Connecticut, NH made them illegal even though there has not been any smidgeon of evidence showing they have been able to survive, let alone establish populations that far up. Currently, there is law going into place to whipe out that poorly enforced rule (because even after being illegal for 23yrs, there has only been ONE CASE of it being enforced... which happened within the last couple months, there are hundreds of pet stores who have been carrying them this entire time)
 
Proteus;5026993; said:
herps/reptiles are not my thing, and to be honest with you - I'm supporting them on that regulation.


There are too many people out there that shouldn't be owning any of those reptiles or have any business selling/handling them.


there are a ton of people out there who own dogs and cats that shouldnt have them. not to mention so dumb ass fish keepers who release there **** in rivers, ponds and streams down south. and if you dont keep reps then why post here?;)

Joeygee23;5027056; said:
I agree. Taking over Everglades.

check your facts. the media is blowing that WAY out of porportion. i was reading through my girls biology book and they cited the invasive species in the south as an epidemic. go read some more and then come back.



all of these friggin laws do nothing. they can try and regulate all they want. it isnt going to work. if someone is dead set on getting a large snake then they will get it. its really not that hard. i used to be able to walk into a local fish/reptile wholesaler and i could walk out with all sorts of stuff i wasnt supposed to have. the goverment should just stick to what they know. oh wait then they would be out of a job because they know NOTHING. this is just another way for them to sit around and piss money away on stupid regulations that do no good in the first place.

and why would it be a good thing to support this? do you know how many people would be out of jobs? what happens to people who already own these animals? where would they go? IMHO implementing this law would make things far worse. you will have everyone running trying to find homes for there snakes. and if no one can keep them people will just dump them in the wild.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com