rhom or spilo/mac?
- Thread starter Fishes33
- Start date
Hmmm.... id'ing juvenile serras from a picture alone, will always be more guess than fact.
It could be a rhomb. But the terminal band on the caudal-fin seems somewhat transparent, this could point towards S.sanchezi.
I also see some oval appearing spots on this specimen, this along with the coloration of the gill-covers and analfin, could tell it's a S. gibbus if it's from the Rio Araguaia, and if the terminal band of the caudal-fin is only obscured by the quality of the picture.
It all depends on origin, and present size of the fish.
It could be a rhomb. But the terminal band on the caudal-fin seems somewhat transparent, this could point towards S.sanchezi.
I also see some oval appearing spots on this specimen, this along with the coloration of the gill-covers and analfin, could tell it's a S. gibbus if it's from the Rio Araguaia, and if the terminal band of the caudal-fin is only obscured by the quality of the picture.
It all depends on origin, and present size of the fish.
PiranhaBoss.dk;1085495; said:
so why are you guessing sanchezi or S. gibbus? lol
Diffinetly not a sanchezi and too high back for a gibbus
anyways try to find out where it was collected.
Hmmm.... I was not really guessing, just listing what my eyes see.
Remember, when a picture is scaled up or down, the ratio may change too, this will often give the object a, more or less, elongated and hig-backed appearance.
Even a PC-monitor may make a picture different from real life on it's own.
I suspect this particular specimen to be a s. rhombeus- variant.
I too have a fish appearing much the same, making it either a S. gibbus or a S. rhombeus, but as the given origin is doubtfull to me, only time will let me know, if ever.
Remember, when a picture is scaled up or down, the ratio may change too, this will often give the object a, more or less, elongated and hig-backed appearance.
Even a PC-monitor may make a picture different from real life on it's own.
I suspect this particular specimen to be a s. rhombeus- variant.
I too have a fish appearing much the same, making it either a S. gibbus or a S. rhombeus, but as the given origin is doubtfull to me, only time will let me know, if ever.
Unless you know what is the collection point..I would point out to be a rhomb.
not a gibbus and way to off to be a Sanchazis
not a gibbus and way to off to be a Sanchazis