running 2 wet drys with one pump

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

kwantz

Candiru
MFK Member
Nov 1, 2007
165
1
48
Ontario
Does anyone here run 2 wet dry units with one powerful pump? I know it can be done, but does anyone here do it? Controlling the flow rates with valves? I know its better to have two pumps just incase one goes down, but to save money Im thinking of running two different sumps with one pump
 
yes if you mean running them inline with eachother. and using a couple T's and connect them to the inlet of the pump. Obviously I would have to buy a pump fast enough to keep up with the flow right? i just want to do it this way, I have 3 unused rubbermaid containers that arnt being used right now. So i plan on turning them into sumps. BUt I was to cut corners and save money and just run them inline to one single pump.

Also does anyone have any quick and good easy rubbermaid sump designs i use to have one but i didnt book mark it, now i cant find it for the life of me.
 
Heres my 2x Marineland tidepool wet/dry run with a 600 gph pump. I had to connect them together, 1) i only need to top off one tidepool 2) provides alot more filtration than just 1. its very easy to do.

240 gal 003.jpg

240gal 004.jpg
 
piggy67;4011184; said:
Heres my 2x Marineland tidepool wet/dry run with a 600 gph pump. I had to connect them together, 1) i only need to top off one tidepool 2) provides alot more filtration than just 1. its very easy to do.
i got same sump ;) but instead of bio wheel , i put 5 lb of bio rings, scrubbies . Works well ;)
 
right on thats exactly what I plan on doing, well instead of 2, im probably going to put 3 inline... 2 -30 gal rubbermaids, and a old 55 gal tank. Need to make filtration big enough for my 700 gal
 
700 gallons ? Redundancy is a beautiful thing. As systems get larger and the risks of catostrophic failures increase why would one think about saving a few dollars ? My question is genuine, not critical. And hey maybe I'm missing something here.
 
Redundancy? i was thinking more effiency. It makes alot of sence to me to do it this way, plus im not rich. and spending 700 plus dollars on 3 pumps. or 200 dollars on one powerfull pump to that will serve the exact same purpose? I know it would be nice to have 3 pumps going, just incase one goes down, or when a sump is being serviced i can keep 2 going etc...

also i was thinking one powerful pump running 3 sumps would save on electricty.
 
kwantz;4013445;4013445 said:
Redundancy? i was thinking more effiency. It makes alot of sence to me to do it this way, plus im not rich. and spending 700 plus dollars on 3 pumps. or 200 dollars on one powerfull pump to that will serve the exact same purpose? I know it would be nice to have 3 pumps going, just incase one goes down, or when a sump is being serviced i can keep 2 going etc...

also i was thinking one powerful pump running 3 sumps would save on electricty.
Well let's dry run a scenario.
You have a 700 gallon tank. You don't state what turnover rate you are looking for but the majority on this forum tends to think life starts at 10X turnover so I'll use that as an example.

A single Reeflo 7400 from Aquarium Guys will get you around 10X turnover depending on Head. This will cost $378.99 and use 5.2 amps @240v

Two Reeflo 1/8hp's From Aquarium guys will give the same turnover and cost you $ 258.99 each or $ 517.98 for the pair. They will use 1.3 amps each or 2.6 amps for the pair @ 120v.

So let's review, If you spend an extra $ 138.99 up front you get a number of advantages.
First, you have the safety of redundant pumps.
Second, After a quick search no one seems to stock the larger pumps. The smaller look to be in stock in more locations. This is especially important if you use one pump, don't own a spare and need one in a hurry.
Last but not least it looks like two smaller pumps will be cheaper to operate, so I imagine you will get your $ 138.99 back fairly quickly.

There is a distinct possibility that someone has actual experience with this and can prove me wrong or at least offer a cheaper alternative.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com