Sex ID on Synspilum?

eyespot

Piranha
MFK Member
Mar 17, 2007
195
104
76
Williamstown, MA
I bought this synspilum about a year ago at 3 inches and it's now about 8 inches (some keepers on here argue there is a distinction between melanurus and I bought mine as a synspilum). It has blue eyes which isn't a guarantee it's a male but I thought I'd throw that out there. On a slightly unrelated note I owned a 14" dominant male about 25 years ago that developed a healthy nuchal hump and I noticed I rarely ever see adult males with nuchal humps anymore. I'm leaning towards male but I'd like to hear informed opinions.

IMG_0187.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeaninel

roliva

Plecostomus
MFK Member
Dec 21, 2005
386
67
61
pa
How is he/she doing?
 

duanes

MFK Moderators
Staff member
Moderator
MFK Member
Jun 7, 2007
21,026
26,355
2,910
Isla Taboga Panama via Milwaukee
The name synspillum, is no longer considered valid by the scientific community.
DNA test have shown that melanurus and synspillum are the same fish, just location/color variants.
Because melanurus was described first (Gunther 1862) that name takes precedence,
synspillum was not described until 1935 by Hubbs, thus syspillum was dropped. Of course many aquarists are often hardheaded and resist change (and science).
Back in the 80s they were imported as separate species, melanurus often predominantly dark yellow, and black, with a more sleek body shape, and very little blue and red, while the syspillum variant was collected in a different location, sporting the more popular reds and blues, and less sleek shape.
But color or even shape is not always a determiner of being a separate species, it just indicates adaptation of a population to certain separate environments.
 
Last edited:
zoomed.com
hikariusa.com
aqaimports.com
Store