I never said the other fish did not have an impact. In my first post I even mentioned some introduced species (brown trout, rainbow trout, carp). But the addition of the snakehead will only make matters worse. I'm not going to celebrate their introduction and undermine the impact they will have.TurdBuglar said:The issue is not whether you want the snakeheads in the Potomac or not. no one is saying snakeheads won't have an impact. i'm saying why are people discriminating solely against the snakehead? Why do you say a snakehead has a larger negative impact than other predatory fish? Trout, Muskie, LMB and Flathead cats and other large, predatory fish are commonly introduced into waters in which they are not native to. Are you saying they are not having an ecological impact but snakeheads do? That is ignorance.
AMEN!!The TRUST said:hahahahahahah CJ! LOL! I hear ya Wes.
LMB has been introduced outside its natural range and has decimated other native species. I also agree with you on the snakeheads not eating off everything in the lakes and rivers in Asia. IMO, my support goes to the Snakeheads. I hope that they spread as far as they can. Fishermen will finally see that they do make a great game fish species. For all you know it could attract tourist to fish for them. The same way Peacock Bass has done for southern FL.