The answer top the water change question

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

repair

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,157
10
0
Indy
OK I found this in the Feb 2006 Tropical fish Hobbyist magazine....... Isn't this Dec 2005? Oh well.

This is from an artical from Jack Wardley on page 36 and 37 and I qoute....

"And while on the subject of water treatment I should explain how a private water treatment company made some interesting studies with water from my discus hatchery. This happened at a time when our local water treatment facility became two facilities, the results being that I had not established any connection with the new chemists in the water treatment plants.


I was interested in the amounts of toxic waste in my discus water in relation to the amounts and frequency of my water changes. I set up a 40 gallon tank with 20 discus, each 2 inches (5 cm) in size. Needless to say, I carefully monitored the feedings of the fish, as well as the water pH at all times.

We have to begin somewhere, so let's use the more or less standard once per week water change of 40 percent that many discus hobbyists have made. The results were interesting.

Changing 5.7 percent of the water each day (which means 40 percent weekly) indicated a toxic level of 20.6.

The twice weekly changes (each one 20 percent) resulted in a toxic level of 19.2,

and the once per week change of 40 percent resulted in a toxic level of 17.7.

The tests did indicate that, if one does not want to make a weekly water change of 40 percent, it's probably better to make the change all at once weekly rather than breaking it up into 20 percent changes twice a week or daily changes of 5.7 percent."


I think this is the answer we have been looking for. :thumbsup:
 
Good find!
 
the mark of a good scientific test of anykind is duplicability! Has this been duplicated? Could it be that he is the only one who would come up with these results good info but what other factors are contributing would even Jack Wardley come up with the same thing if he did this agian? Not to be pessimistic which I am not just warning others to not take limited amounts of data as proof of anything! Thanks for sharing we should make a forum so that people can do these kinds of tests post them and let other MFKers repeat and refine!!!
 
rweedon said:
the mark of a good scientific test of anykind is duplicability! Has this been duplicated? Could it be that he is the only one who would come up with these results good info but what other factors are contributing would even Jack Wardley come up with the same thing if he did this agian? Not to be pessimistic which I am not just warning others to not take limited amounts of data as proof of anything! Thanks for sharing we should make a forum so that people can do these kinds of tests post them and let other MFKers repeat and refine!!!

I agree.

Anyone got connections at the water company so that you can get the testing done?


From what I have experienced I would agree with the articale but I can't prove it.

I use a drip system and change the water in my large tanks at more then 100% a week and on my baby tanks I do 300% a week.

You know how you can see black in the gravel when it needs to be vaced? Well in my big tanks I had to do a gravel vac every week because if I let it go 2 weeks you would start to see the black form in the gravel...... well since I've gone to the drip system I'm now doing gravel vacs once a month and I still haven't seen the black in the gravel.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com