the ultimate...... FX5!!!!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

scottswald

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Feb 6, 2010
496
1
0
blyth, newcastle, england
what price for a second hand fx5 is considered a complete steal???

i dont mind waiting a while to find one at that price as i dont even have a need for one yet, but i like bargains!!!

in pounds as i live in uk.

what is the smallest application this can be used in?
 
ebay is your best bet but keep an eye on aquarist classifieds. 2nd hand they range from about £65-£120, that ive found, but you can pick a brand spanking new one off of ebay for £119. some people expect to get back what they payed for it.
if you buy 2nd hand then remember you arent covered by the distance selling regulations should it not be what you expected nor do you have any form of guarantee unless it doesnt work upon first use and you used paypal.
if you find a cheap one on ebay then remember it probably wont stay below £80 for very long. most dont supply the hose when they are 2nd hand for some reason.
 
what type of canister filter could i use for a small tank?

are canisters available for smaller tanks such as 25g or 55g? i want something that will overfilter my tanks but im now having much luck with my searches....
 
people use fx5's on 55g tanks all the time, only if its not too much current for your fish though.

as for other canisters, there are lots of sizes availible. remember that on most boxes the GPH rating is usually without media and head. one company puts the true GPH on the box but i cant remember which.
the tank rating is pretty pants too, i would look for a filter that is rated to double your tank volume. for example i wouldnt use a fluval 405 (rated up to 400L) on more than a 200 litre tank. the flow just isnt enough IMO.

eheim are generally considered the standard for the filter industry but thay lack a bit in flow for my taste and are ridiculously expensive to buy new. eheim promise to make parts for an off production filter for at least a decade after last production.

flluval generally have more bang for your buck but have had parts issues with past filter models that are only a year or two off production. though the fx5 seems to be considered the best at the moment by most except the eheim fan boys/girls. the fx5 has good flow,good media capacity, good price and it seems excellent reliability.

there are other brands too such as rena and tetra. rena seem popular on this board.
it could be worth looking at a sump or hang on back filters as well. sumps can have huge GPH and they can be cheap to set up.
good luck deciding.
 
there are other brands too such as rena and tetra.

Avoid the Tetratec 2400 unless you can handle the noise, I had 2 motorheads for mine and they both sounded like a helicopter taking off. Great customer service - poor product.
 
cichlid2006;3966550; said:
people use fx5's on 55g tanks all the time, only if its not too much current for your fish though.

as for other canisters, there are lots of sizes availible. remember that on most boxes the GPH rating is usually without media and head. one company puts the true GPH on the box but i cant remember which.
the tank rating is pretty pants too, i would look for a filter that is rated to double your tank volume. for example i wouldnt use a fluval 405 (rated up to 400L) on more than a 200 litre tank. the flow just isnt enough IMO.

eheim are generally considered the standard for the filter industry but thay lack a bit in flow for my taste and are ridiculously expensive to buy new. eheim promise to make parts for an off production filter for at least a decade after last production.

flluval generally have more bang for your buck but have had parts issues with past filter models that are only a year or two off production. though the fx5 seems to be considered the best at the moment by most except the eheim fan boys/girls. the fx5 has good flow,good media capacity, good price and it seems excellent reliability.

there are other brands too such as rena and tetra. rena seem popular on this board.
it could be worth looking at a sump or hang on back filters as well. sumps can have huge GPH and they can be cheap to set up.
good luck deciding.

i have built a 40 litre sump for my 100 litre tank, i've made a pvc 3/4 inch over flow like the ones in the stickies, but it is sooooo slow!!! and my pump is sooooo noisy (old pump - doesnt even have a make on it). so i figured if i had to buy a new pump and overflow, it would be cheaper and more effective to buy a canister filter..... you guys/girls agree?
 
That is an ongoing debate for me. I have a FX5 on a 55, and a sump on a 75. which one do I like better. the only thing I dont like with my sump is that it doesn't pull debris off the bottom. Although i am only using the one overflow that pulls off the top. But the tank is clean. Now with the FX5 it cleans amazingly but does not pull anything from the top. So unless your output is facing up you will need to use air stones to break the surface. I would do both if I had a bigger tank. canister for the mechanical, and sump for bio.
 
cichlid2006;3968270; said:
this thread may help you decide.http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=307515

but since you already have a sump built why not just add a 2nd over flow and a new pump.

will take a look...

because the overflow should handle these amounts of water with ease, its just not built right.

it could be 1 of 2 reasons imo:

1: pipe is just pushed into fittings it's not glued in, will glue them tomorrow

2: i havnt got anything to prime it with so i think it will have air in (unsure what to use), today i had to block my vent (temperarily making it a syphon) and suck the end with my mouth, till i get plenty of water and then take the plug out. i swallowed a mouthfull of water and feel a bit poorly, not surprizing considering the ammonia and nitrites acid.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com