And why are malawis so much more popular?
I don't know if its just me, but I find nearly all tanganyikan cichlids to be awesome and fascinating. Meanwhile, I find the malawi cichlids to be boring as hell. Does anyone feel the same way?
To try to answer my own question, it probably has something to do with the fact that lake tanganyika is for cichlids what the galapagos islands are for finches: an evolutionary hotspot that causes a high level of speciation and diversity, circumstances that encourage species to develop highly specialized niches, and all that. Because of this, there is simply more variety among tanganyikans and more interesting behaviors.
My second guess is that many of the tanganyikan cichlids seem to be highly structure oriented, and it is simply a personal preference of mine that I like benthic fish, cave dwellers, etc.
Obviously, the malawis are common because they are active and brightly colored, but to me they're just lame in comparison.
Even the most common/plain tanganyikans like brichardis and leleupis tend to really capture my interest, while similar-colored malawis are just bright fish to me... I think it has something to do with the body shape.
Does anyone think that there is something odd about this - that the fish from one of the rift lakes are so aesthetically/behaviorally appealing to me, while the fish from the other rift lake are pretty much uniformly boring? Could be I just don't know enough about malawi's, but... ehh
Any malawi-centric fans out there who want to engage in a totally senseless argument?
I don't know if its just me, but I find nearly all tanganyikan cichlids to be awesome and fascinating. Meanwhile, I find the malawi cichlids to be boring as hell. Does anyone feel the same way?
To try to answer my own question, it probably has something to do with the fact that lake tanganyika is for cichlids what the galapagos islands are for finches: an evolutionary hotspot that causes a high level of speciation and diversity, circumstances that encourage species to develop highly specialized niches, and all that. Because of this, there is simply more variety among tanganyikans and more interesting behaviors.
My second guess is that many of the tanganyikan cichlids seem to be highly structure oriented, and it is simply a personal preference of mine that I like benthic fish, cave dwellers, etc.
Obviously, the malawis are common because they are active and brightly colored, but to me they're just lame in comparison.
Even the most common/plain tanganyikans like brichardis and leleupis tend to really capture my interest, while similar-colored malawis are just bright fish to me... I think it has something to do with the body shape.
Does anyone think that there is something odd about this - that the fish from one of the rift lakes are so aesthetically/behaviorally appealing to me, while the fish from the other rift lake are pretty much uniformly boring? Could be I just don't know enough about malawi's, but... ehh
Any malawi-centric fans out there who want to engage in a totally senseless argument?
