Your chance to win $25 million dollars!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

davo

Aimara
MFK Member
Jan 9, 2006
17,544
43
132
England
It's Richard Branson's 25-million-U.S.-dollar question: Can someone develop an effective, economical way to reduce global warming by sucking greenhouse gases from the atmosphere?

Last week the British tycoon and former U.S. Vice President Al Gore announced the Virgin Earth Challenge. The program offers the biggest science prize in history to anyone who can come up with a commercially viable system for removing human-produced carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere.

The deadline isn't until 2010, but CO2-reducing concepts have long been underway, including artificial trees with "leaves" that absorb the gas, solar-powered scrubbers, and carbon-sucking towers in Antarctia.

To win, the system should be able to scrub the equivalent of at least a billion tons of the greenhouse gas a year.

Carbon dioxide, which is produced from the combustion of fossil fuels, is the leading culprit being blamed for global warming.

"Most of the climate change that we'll see in the next 30 years will be the result of emissions of carbon dioxide that are already in the system," said Jim Walker, chief operating officer of the Climate Group.

The independent nonprofit is acting as an advisor to the judges of the Virgin Earth Challenge.

Solar Scrubbers

Researchers have been applying their minds to the CO2 problem since well before Branson's announcement.

Technologies have already been developed to successfully cut CO2 emissions from sources such as coal-fired power stations.

And methods have been found for underground storage of CO2 captured from burning coal and natural gas.
 
GJC;708049; said:

even if that is the case, can you explain to me why the amount of carbon ppm in the atmosphere is almost directly proportionate to global temperature? Water vapour is always in the atmosphere, its the amount of other gases humans are changing, particularly C02, and if thats heating global temperatures, there will also be more water vapour in the atmosphere.
 
I want to win 25 million, so a couple of you guys want to get together and if we win, split the cash to create one monster sized tank :headbang2 :headbang2

GJC;708049; said:
I know there is contoversy over the subject, but that site doesn't look to reliable. Most of the sources are outdated, and one source was made in 2005 but on the bottom of the page he said he last revised the site it in 2003?
 
sounds like a good deal. I know there are certain types of algae that can be used to make hydrogen power, which wouldn't necessarily get rid of the C02 but would be a better fuel than ethanol or petrol based fuels. Wonder if that would count lol.
didnt want to say it, but i dont believe a lot of what is on that website either.
 
davo;708088; said:
sounds like a good deal. I know there are certain types of algae that can be used to make hydrogen power, which wouldn't necessarily get rid of the C02 but would be a better fuel than ethanol or petrol based fuels. Wonder if that would count lol.
didnt want to say it, but i dont believe a lot of what is on that website either.

Sounds like a good place to start :thumbsup:
Who else wants in?
 
so what happens when it works too well and we take to much away?

plus Co2 is only one of the many greenhouse gases.

just afraid that we could over do it like we tend to do.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com