It's a little disapointing to see the nomination thread for such a deserving member being turned into debate over past awards or symantics over the rules. If you agree with the nomination vote YES, if not state why or abstaine. The rules are clearly posted for all to see, the reason for supporting evadance if for those not familiar with the nominy to see wht they are nominated and then vote accordingly if you are familiar with the nominy you know why they were nominated and whouldn't need to see supporting evadance. It's clear to me so where's the confusion? If I don't know the nominy I read the threads to support the nomination, if I do I can vote based on past knowledeg or experiance. Ken is a solid contributor, let's not disrespect his nomination or what he has contributed by bickering over this. Please.