Juxtaroberto;4718079; said:
I think the reason most people have RTCs that max out at around 3.5' is because of stunting, or poor water quality, or tank too small for them. It's not like someone somewhere once pulled out a 5' RTC from the Amazon, and it's never happened again. Fishers have consistently pulled out 5' RTCs from their natural habitat, so it is safe to assume that is their average size. Their shortcomings in the home aquaria are not an excuse for smaller tanks, but a consequence of them.
^EXACTLY. it isn't that it has happened, but it happens CONSISTENTLY.
Pyramid_Party;4735836; said:
I find it funny how people can be so inconsistent with their beliefs. They argue how cruel it is to keep a certain fish in a certain size tank, yet you search one of their tank threads and see their tanks overstocked. Almost every guy who keeps pbass and aro's keep them in tanks too small.
I hate how they also throw out wild fish sizes. We damn well know that if the biggest wild caught fish is 6 foot, it DOES NOT mean EVERY fish will reach that size. Comparing wild fish with captive fish is ridiculous. And it's even more ridiculous to tell people not to keep fish because they get too big and you yourself turn around and keep fish that will outgrow your tank.
1st, comparing wild fish sizes to captive fish sizes is anything but ridiculous...It is the size the fish SHOULD be able to match or come close to.
Also, it is a great indicator of how a fish is doing.
Every fish may not reach 5 or 6 feet, but (close to) every fish has the potential to come close. Since the potential is there, any keeper is obligated to be prepared for it.
2nd, just because "Almost every guy who keeps pbass and aro's keep them in tanks too small", does not make it okay to do it. A lot of people do stuff that is immoral, but that is ANYTHING but justification.
FLAME ON