aclockworkorange;5112109; said:IMO, really not a useful document, and is actually pretty misleading. Listing only the first three ingredients is not helpful. You can list 8 different fish as the first ingredients, but that doesn't mean that product has "more" fish in it--and are those dry weight or wet weight? They still have protein percentages, and even those are misleading. Every pellet or flake uses some sort of binder to bind the proteins together, even though it may be listed further down the ingredient list, it could actually be MORE depending on how a company has decided to list and weigh their ingredients.
Also, no mention of things like ash content, the digestibility of the protein used, artificial colors or flavorings (Hikari is well known for putting MSG in their food), etc etc...
Thank you for posting it though Mojo, it should open up some interesting discussion on how labels themselves can even be misleading.
I disagree. Listing the first three items does signify the majority of the product at least by percentage.
From the FDA site on the Pet food industry under "ingredients":
All ingredients are required to be listed in order of predominance by weight. The weights of ingredients are determined as they are added in the formulation, including their inherent water content. This latter fact is important when evaluating relative quantity claims, especially when ingredients of different moisture contents are compared.
aclockworkorange;5112330; said:Typically, you are correct. But in the fish food industry this line of thinking doesn't give the whole picture. 100 pounds of fish, whether it's 8 kinds of fish or two kinds of fish, is still 100 pounds of fish. You also have to take wet VS dry weight of the fish into account--a lot of that weight is water when wet, and obviously everything is dry when you make it in to dry food.
You're saying that this industry is governed differently than the other pet food groups...(dogs, cats, etc.)?